Posted on 08/13/2017 9:30:03 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
The Short Take-off Vertical Landing (STOVL) F-35B Lightning II test aircraft has performed maiden land based Ski Jump with on board UK specific weapons.
The BF-2 aircraft piloted by Peter "Wizzer" Wilson performed the Ski Jump with Paveway IV LGB & MBDA ASRAAM short range air to air missile, from the Naval Air Station in Patuxent River, Maryland, United States.
Four 500 lb Paveway IV laser guided bombs and two MBDA ASRAAM were integrated on external under wing pylons. Both of them can also carried in the internal weapon bay.
This external weapon load out will be employed when payload outweighs the stealth requirements of a mission.
Photo : Arnel Parker
The UK’s Royal Air Force (RAF) already uses ASRAAM and Paveway IV on its existing Tornado and Typhoon combat jet fleet. The successful tests are a step towards full interoperability between the current and future fast jets that will be used by the RAF and the UK’s Royal Navy from 2018.
Flight trials with these UK made weapons were commenced in 2014. The first guided Paveway IV release from F-35B was achieved in December 2016, while the F-35A fired the ASRAAM for first time in March 2017.
Both of them will be certified as a part of the Block 3F software release scheduled for May 2018. UK also plan to integrate the MBDA Meteor long range missile and the Spear anti-tank guided missile on to its F-35B fleet in future.
The STOVL F-35B is the most expensive variant of the F-35 family costing about 135 million each and also the least capable of the three.
UK plans to procure 138 of these world's first supersonic STOVL aircraft, for operating from the two under construction ski jump equipped Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers (Royal Navy) and land based bases (RAF).
For more than 30 years, the U.K. has used the ski jump approach to carrier operations as an alternative to the catapults and arresting gear used aboard U.S. aircraft carriers.
The shorter UK carriers feature an upward-sloped ramp at the bow of the ship. Curved at its leading edge, a ski-jump ramp simultaneously launches aircraft upward and forward, allowing aircraft to take off with more weight and less end-speed than required for an unassisted horizontal launch aboard U.S. aircraft carriers.
The F-35B STOVL operation is made possible through the Rolls-Royce patented shaft-driven LiftFan® propulsion system and an engine nozzle that can swivel 90 degrees when in short takeoff/vertical landing mode. Because of the LiftFan®, the STOVL variant has smaller internal weapon bay and less internal fuel capacity than the F-35A. It uses the probe and drogue method of aerial refueling.
The UK will declare F-35 maritime Initial Operational Capability in 2020. Each HMS Queen Elizabeth can embark up to 36 F-35B aircraft, which is 280 meters, or nearly 1,000 feet long, and displaces up to 65,000 tons of water. It is so big that each of its two propellers weigh 33 tons.
so flight tests with these weapons began 2014.
It’s 3/4 through 2017.
Goof thing we were not building weapons this way in WWII. By this time in WWII, we have built fleets of aircraft 60,000 strong.
Guess it is a necessary evil to get the added loft for the ramp shots.
Looks like it helps keep the nose up. Wonder how fast they’d have to go to fold it back. F- 15 brake comes up in the rear, naturally.
Well if we turned over most of our industry to war production like we did in WWII maybe we would.
Maybe the position of the jet engine auxiliary intake opening (right behind the fan) was a problem in the previous configuration.
I think it was simply a matter of unimpeded air flow to the lift fan. The dual bi-fold arrangement didn’t ‘help’ the air into the fan. They were probably fine for the demonstrator, but when you start asking the production models to carry a payload you need to squeeze more out of the system.
Maybe the position of the jet engine auxiliary intake opening (right behind the fan) was a problem in the previous configuration.
You are correct un that the X-35B did have bifolding doors over the lift fan intake, and a second set of doors as auxiliary air intake for the engines during hover.
It was found that in strong side winds during hover, air flow into the lift fan was disturbed, intermittently lowering the the thrust available. Not a good thing when hovering over a pitching deck.
What industry?
Globalist Free Traitors™ have f***ed the country up in so many ways.
We still have automotive factories and aircraft factories, machine shops and electronic component manufacturers. The comparison was to WWII.
so it's gonna be a bombtruck after all... feh/spit
Despite the propaganda we are still an industrial powerhouse.
Trying to put a happy face on the fact that they have never and will never master the art of the catapult.
Everyone knows that ramps are far inferior to catapults as far as payload.
The STOVL F-35B is the most expensive variant of the F-35 family costing about 135 million each and also the least capable of the three.Least capable as far as payload, but infinitely more capable at STOVL flight.
The F-35B is still a very capable multirole fighter, as well. It is a major accomplishment in that it has STOVL capabilities, and is still has flight performance very close to the other variants.
“...and it still...”
Sorry.
Who is 'they'? If you mean the British, they invented the steam catapult in the first place!
Apparently, they find the steam catapult too difficult to use and maintain, thus the ramp.
It limits them, and by all performance metrics, a ramp is inferior to a catapult.
It isn’t a question of difficulty but of cost. At one time there was an option to fit the new carriers with EMALS catapults and equip with non-STOVL F35s, but it would have cost a billion more. The previous generation of Invincible-class carriers were designed from the outset for Harriers, so didn’t need catapults.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.