Posted on 08/12/2017 4:30:10 AM PDT by Kaslin
If you’re running a mile relay, do you want the four fastest runners, or the most diverse team?
The creed of the Feminazi (though, never actually spoken...).
Google is evil
Why is it we NEVER hear the Feminazi’s criticizing the objectification of women by islam?
Apparently, getting more women top paying technology jobs regardless of their desire or aptitude to perform those jobs is a bigger problem than the systemic female genital mutilation that occurs in many parts of the world, even in Minnesota, all in the name of islam.
Not only does Google suffer from this groupthink problem, but in many ways it's even worse at Facebook and Twitter. It won't be long before some whistleblower comes out of the shadows and accuses Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey of fostering a similar groupthink environment.
One of the reasons society is what is, God’s plan of manly leadership is being pushed aside for women’s equality, and God didn’t design us that way. There should be more men in college and in grad school, that should be pushed, not higher diversity.
The de-genderizers think there is something wrong with any society where men and women walk different paths in life, e.g., there was something wrong with Harry Truman’s mother because she wasn’t into science and technology.
“Are women less capable of doing tech on a high level? “
Being capable and being willing to throw your heart and soul into something and to work nights and weekends on long projects are two different things. In my decades in IT, few women are willing to do the later and that does change their value to their employers.
No amount of ideology or good wishes can alter those facts. When people do, only bad things happen.
So men get degrees in useful fields, while women focus on what could be called “pursuits of the idle rich”. Great idea if you are independently wealthy, but not a recipe for success as a responsible head of household. Since women focus on the degrees that don’t provide a return on investment, it means that things have not changed much since the 1950’s, when many girls went to college to major in finding a husband. Now it has a different name, and increasingly a different result.
There is nothing “modern” about feminism! It is ancient in its roots.
The Gods of Feminism have been unable to overcome this barrier of biology, that women are actually interested in different things than men. So they've ramped it up now. They're pretending that the biological differences between men and women are nothing, that the fact that one has different genitalia than the other is no more consequential than the fact that some people have brown hair, some have blond, and a very few have orange. Never mind that women lose bigly when men can pretend to be women and outdo them in those areas reserved for women (women's sports). This only creates cognitive dissonance, which is a normal state for liberals.
‘The creed of the Feminazi (though, never actually spoken...).’
yes, but their comeback will always be ‘so now the jackboot is on the other foot...see how you like it...
Good question. Also, why don’t we EVER hear about the Mommy Track? Women dropping out of or taking time off from the employment scene?
Think that might help account for the “disparity” of women in STEM, law, business et al? For sure it does, I see it all the time . . . highly educated, smart women who are happily married and perfectly content to play parent and homemaker, with no intention of returning to the labor market. Certainly not with their now-outdated technical skills, continuing education, experience, etc.
Or such women who have taken so much maternity leave and time off that they’ve fallen behind their peers in productivity and experience and promotion. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, they are to be complimented for family first. But it does help explain why the numbers don’t match up for the quotas that feminazis want
bfl
Even in areas where genius women pursue careers in STEM fields, they are only drawn to certain careers. And how they conduct themselves in those careers is different from the way men conduct themselves. I see this every day... the majority (11/15) of the Ph.D. level scientists I supervise are men, and the men are far more focused on the science and more likely to put in long hours. I see other differences, as well. While I do not have a large sample size, I suspect that a systematic study would confirm that the differences I see are real.
‘In my decades in IT, few women are willing to do the later and that does change their value to their employers.’
but, but, on TV commercials we see women staying at the office after closing, and doing work related travelling, leaving the Mr. at home to fend for the family, which the TV commercials also tell us he can’t even do for himself, much less the kids, without blowing the house to smithereens...and then phoning the wife and begging her to come home...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.