Basic evolution theory can only be a "lie" if its assumptions are lies, such assumptions as: 1) only natural explanations for natural processes, 2) nature worked the same in the past as we see today, and 3) "Occam's Razor" the simplest explanation that works is the best.
Most people, including all scientists, don't think those assumptions are lies and would not accept your association of them or science in general with Satan.
“Basic evolution theory can only be a “lie” if its assumptions are lies, such assumptions as: 1) only natural explanations for natural processes, 2) nature worked the same in the past as we see today, and 3) “Occam’s Razor” the simplest explanation that works is the best.
Most people, including all scientists, don’t think those assumptions are lies and would not accept your association of them or science in general with Satan.”
1. “Natural explanations” cannot explain how millions and millions of lines of code could have randomly arisen in the DNA of every living creature. Neither do the maths support such a foolish explanation.
2. Evolutionists cannot produce a single example of one species morphing into another species in our lifetime. Nor can they prove that the hierarchy of being in which we live is somehow the result of a process that no one has ever observed.
3. Taking away the agent cause, leaving only matter, form, and end makes the supposed science of evolution convoluted, for now the poor material cause has to take on the duties of the agent. The same holds true for the formal cause. And the final cause has to be suppressed. All of this damages scientific inquiry.
“Basic evolution theory can only be a “lie” if its assumptions are lies, such assumptions as: 1) only natural explanations for natural processes, 2) nature worked the same in the past as we see today, and 3) “Occam’s Razor” the simplest explanation that works is the best.
Most people, including all scientists, don’t think those assumptions are lies and would not accept your association of them or science in general with Satan.”
1. “Natural explanations” cannot explain how millions and millions of lines of code could have randomly arisen in the DNA of every living creature. Neither do the maths support such a foolish explanation.
2. Evolutionists cannot produce a single example of one species morphing into another species in our lifetime. Nor can they prove that the hierarchy of being in which we live is somehow the result of a process that no one has ever observed.
3. Taking away the agent cause, leaving only matter, form, and end makes the supposed science of evolution convoluted, for now the poor material cause has to take on the duties of the agent. The same holds true for the formal cause. And the final cause has to be suppressed. All of this damages scientific inquiry.