Obviously there is a Major Problem here, Since we know there are more registered voters than actual people, Why can't we also find out if they Actually Voted?? Shouldn't that information be available??
Oh I forgot, all the Elected Officials in California swear up and down that the Voter Rolls are Accurate and that not one single illegal vote was cast.
/s
1 posted on
08/05/2017 10:39:21 AM PDT by
eyeamok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: eyeamok
Judicial Watch “Warns” California.
Ooooh...that’ll stop it.
47 posted on
08/05/2017 11:43:38 AM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: eyeamok
Odd. Closer you get the border, the worse the discrepancy. Wonder what explains that?
To: eyeamok
To: eyeamok; All
Keeping in mind that the percentage of ‘registered’ voters in any district is far below the number of ‘eligible age’ for voting - and those numbers are staggering -
What is the average percentage of registered voters per eligible to register? Is it even 50-60%
54 posted on
08/05/2017 12:10:56 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
( Christian is as Christian does mt-h)
To: eyeamok
Possible explanations: LA and Frisco could be result of college population. Now can research be done to see if students are double voting at home. That can and should be done. SD can be result lf military population in the county who vhoose not to vote absenter but are not residents ofHtge county.
To: eyeamok
...and note that ALL of the listed areas have Hispanics living there.
56 posted on
08/05/2017 12:26:54 PM PDT by
BobL
(In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
To: eyeamok
I wonder if they take military voters in account.
I vote legally in one of those counties, but I have not lived there in several years.
Around military bases, there should be lower than expected numbers of voters based on the voting age population.
Not to say that there is not a problem with illegal voting, but I would hope that all of the legal voters are accounted for, especially those who must vote absentee.
57 posted on
08/05/2017 12:27:54 PM PDT by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: eyeamok
To: eyeamok
Yes, they’ll have to step it up. They intended to have this happen in a lot more than just 11 counties.
60 posted on
08/05/2017 2:25:50 PM PDT by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: eyeamok
http://rrcc.co.la.ca.us/elect/16110016/rr0016p01.htm
NOVEMBER 08, 2016 - GENERAL ELECTION
Final Official Election Returns
As of Date: 12/02/2016 Time: 13:07
Votes Percent
PRESIDENT-VICE PRESIDENT
HILLARY CLINTON DEM 2,464,364 72.03
DONALD J TRUMP REP, AI 769,743 22.50
GARY JOHNSON LIB 88,968 2.60
JILL STEIN GRN 76,465 2.23
GLORIA E LA RIVA PF 21,993 0.64
TOTAL PRECINCTS 4,988 PRECINCTS REPORTING* 4,988 100
REGISTRATION** 5,103,353
61 posted on
08/05/2017 2:54:49 PM PDT by
deport
To: eyeamok
Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%), Los Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San Diego (138%), San Francisco (114%), San Mateo (111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano (111%), Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%). The letter notes that the percentage in L.A. Country may be as high as 144%.
Um, this is much worse than these numbers indicate. These percentages are based on number registered over number of people over 18. That's assuming EVERY SINGLE citizen in those cities is registered to vote.
According to
this site, 67% of eligible citizens across America are actually registered to vote (this includes all the dead people/movers and stuff that haven't been removed), and 55% actually voted. Most places have 2/3 of their people registered, NOT every single one of them! (Much less more than every one..) I find it hard to believe that's real. I'm guessing more than half of those registered to vote in these cities are either dead, fake, or no longer live there.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson