Yeah. I don't bring it up, fingers crossed it continues. My contention all along has been that AG Sessions did the correct thing, recusing himself. He's no dummy, the "aw shucks" first impression isn't the person he's proved to be throughout his career. He's the one who was in the US Senate, so knew that it's worse than a swamp....it's a sewer. If he hadn't recused himself, the sewer rats would've kept him busy 24/7 with the bogus "Russia, Russia, Russia" stuff.
What I'd like to know is who advised President Trump to criticize AG Sessions. One can't help but wonder they know how much it antagonizes a large part of the base.
That's my take, anyway. I look forward to what AG Sessions has to say today.
I thought it curious that Sessions pointed out that the deputy AG and new FBI director had familiarity with a particular intel agency as it was located in Maryland...
It seems too many do not care if there are ‘convictions’ so long as Sessions indicts. And Sessions plainly stated that AG does NOT discuss ongoing investigations... period...