Skip to comments.
Forbes Says Self-Reliant Homesteaders Are “Delusional” and “Mooching” Off “Civil Society”
Organic Prepper, the ^
| 31 July 2017
Posted on 08/03/2017 10:21:02 PM PDT by Lorianne
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
1
posted on
08/03/2017 10:21:02 PM PDT
by
Lorianne
To: Lorianne
Ozimek seems to think self reliance means the same thing as homelessness.
And he thinks homesteading people don’t have families, churches, investments or savings to rely on, not to mention he forgets they pay taxes too...
Maybe he’s just jealous because he has no idea what he’d do if the power went out for three weeks.
2
posted on
08/03/2017 10:38:44 PM PDT
by
piasa
To: Lorianne
Well in all fairness, they are creating a lot of CO2.
To: Lorianne
4
posted on
08/03/2017 10:54:27 PM PDT
by
arthurus
To: Lorianne
The author, Adam Ozimek, did some in-depth research on the sybject:
Sitting in front of a TV watching staged “reality” shows.
5
posted on
08/03/2017 10:58:36 PM PDT
by
Vlad The Inhaler
(We were Trumpin' before Trumpin' was cool.....)
To: Lorianne
“You didn’t build that” ALERT!
Prez for Prison BUMP!
6
posted on
08/03/2017 10:58:49 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: arthurus
He is part of the societal net. He is at the bottom of the food chain when his urban dream collapses and his getto neighbors get hungry. As he is well practiced at wagging his finger with a mouth full of sharp opinions I am sure he will be able to defend his boyfriend.
7
posted on
08/03/2017 10:59:34 PM PDT
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: Lorianne
but instead are mooching off of the civil society, government, and safety net the rest of us contribute to
They contribute to it as well you nitwit.
8
posted on
08/03/2017 11:02:49 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles! (pink bow))
To: piasa
I think that the idea that someone can be completely independent is truly delusional.
There was this guy who was going to prove that he could live completely independently. One day he walked into a swamp completely naked. No clothes, knives, guns, cooking apparatuses, etc. Nothing.
He survived, and quite well indeed. He made his own clothes and shelter. Was able to fashion tools with which to fish and hunt. The whole survivalist nine yards.
The rub of this story, however, is that before he walked into the swamp naked he spent years reading up on how to survive in swamps, and took numerous trips to the swamp to hone his skills. Also, the swamp he walked into was not teeming with drug dealers, paramilitaries, etc.
So yes he was able to live off the land, but only because hundreds (or more likely millions) of people before him had developed the skills necessary to live off the land, and dozens had written books about it. Also, hundreds (or more like thousands) of people were responsible for this swamp being relatively free of dangerous humans. All he had to worry about were the critters.
So yes he is more independent than most and should get lots of kudos for surviving the swamp, and he most likely has a lower welfare-footprint than most ... as most survivalists do.
But neither he, nor anyone else, can claim to be truly and fully independent.
And who would want to be anyway?
To: Tilted Irish Kilt
10
posted on
08/03/2017 11:09:11 PM PDT
by
Freedom56v2
(Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
To: piasa
Ozimek touts society/government as being there when things go bad.
Those who are "self" reliant doesn't mean that they do things ALONE.
The Amish are a great example. Someone's house or barn burns down, the Amish community gathers together to build another.
Self reliant people look to other self reliant people to learn from and to get AND GIVE a helping hand.
It's people like Ozimek who have absolutely nothing to offer anybody else.
When a neighbor has a problem, it's the self reliant person, with a shed or garage full of tools, that comes over to help.
Go to a church with self reliant people and it's these same people who help others in their church, putting a new roof on, or a door in, or wiring a faucet, or plumbing an outlet.
The last few years, I've gone out to Iowa with my buddy. We go in together with his cousin and the three of us buy three pigs (not little). Then we spend the day butchering them together. It's hard work, but satisfying. We enjoy each others company. And save A LOT over what pork would cost at a store.
11
posted on
08/03/2017 11:09:59 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: Lorianne
12
posted on
08/03/2017 11:13:44 PM PDT
by
Daffynition
(The New PTSD: PRESIDENT-Trump Stress Disorder” - The LSN didn’t make Trump, so they can’t break h)
To: Lorianne
Meh
A Canadian woman who tried farming in no Cal....a so called prepper....
She ought to try growing food in some place without good soil
13
posted on
08/03/2017 11:17:52 PM PDT
by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Daffynition
Is that the guy that lived alone in Alaska?
14
posted on
08/03/2017 11:22:50 PM PDT
by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
To: JohnnyP
15
posted on
08/03/2017 11:26:59 PM PDT
by
JohnnyP
(Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
To: Daffynition; JohnnyP
Dick Proenecke
The guy was amazing. I bought his video one year and gave 3 for Christmas gifts.
Even as "self" reliant as he was, he still needed his friend with the bush plane.
No man is an island.
16
posted on
08/03/2017 11:29:49 PM PDT
by
mountn man
(The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
To: arthurus
For no particular reason?
17
posted on
08/03/2017 11:32:33 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: who_would_fardels_bear
I think that the idea that someone can be completely independent is truly delusional.
If a guy can walk naked into a swamp and survive without any assistance or needing any other human contact, whatsoever, then he is completely independent, and all of your "what-if" scenarios don't mean a thing.
One of the worst of your arguments against that is where you say that he's not independent because a theoretical band of drug dealers could come in and kill him. That has nothing to with whether he is independent now. He might not survive successfully as an independent when these fictional bands of drug dealers come, but up until the moment they attack or kill him, he is still living completely independently. It is possible he might even prevail in such a circumstance, given that he knows how to survive in a swamp with nothing and they probably don't.
An even worse argument than that is that this fellow isn't living independently because he read books on survival written by other people. I don't even understand this type of thinking. In the old days, survival skills would have been passed on from generation to generation. The indians did that for thousands of years, but since our generations have been living with modern conveniences for a while, we have lost most of those skills. This guy just corrected that deficiency. Saying that he isn't independent right now because he wasn't born fully independent with the all knowledge in his head upon popping out of his mother's womb is ridiculous. Once he acquired the knowledge, he became independent-capable, even if he wasn't independent before. Then when he went into the swamp without anyone's help, he became fully independent.
Your thinking is bothersome because, though I know you didn't intend it that way, it smacks of the Obama philosophy, where nobody can feel they ever accomplished anything because someone else did stuff, somewhere, so why bother. If this guy you're talking about suddenly were whisked away to an alternate earth where no humans existed, he could survive. That is the very definition of independence.
18
posted on
08/03/2017 11:35:04 PM PDT
by
fr_freak
To: Lorianne
Self reliant people don’t end up in a pig sty if someone doesn’t pick up their garbage for a month. Reliant homesteaders can exist without cities. Cities cannot exist without the produce, “stuff”, and financial subsidies - taxes - paid by these homesteaders.
To: Lorianne
Self-reliance isn’t an all-or-nothing gamble in anticipation of a Mad Max scenario. Many aspects of being self reliant are simple risk management - why have some important part of your life affected by labor strikes in Bangladesh?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson