Posted on 08/02/2017 11:52:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Australia has a critical shortage of climate scientists, leaving it at serious risk of not delivering essential climate and weather services to groups like farmers, coastal communities and international organisations, a report has found.
The report into the nation’s climate science capability by the Australian Academy of Science found the climate science workforce needed to grow by 77 full-time positions over the next four years, with 27 of those positions urgently required.
The Australian Academy of Science’s investigation was prompted by the CSIRO announcement in 2016 that the research agency was going to sack about 100 climate scientists – a number later reduced to about 40.
The report found the areas most in need of investment were general climate modelling, climate observations and climate services, which help industry and the community access information produced by scientists.
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
Otherwise predictions would be, accurate to within better than 1%. Ain't happenin' in my lifetime....
Can we send them some (or all) of ours? We’ll even throw in Al Gore and Bill Nye the (Junk) Science Guy for good measure.
Serious risk of not being saturated by fraudulent propaganda and not being subject to crippling economic regulations.
Can you hear it, can you hear the thunder? You better run, you better take shelter!
To be eligible for Climate Scientist jobs requires good writing skills and a lifetime subscription to Mother Jones. Actual training in Climate Science is discouraged and could easily be a deal killer when job hunting.
Think of all the money they’re saving!
Weather Guessers: Never have so many made so much money for being wrong so many times...excluding Congress of course.
Perhaps they plan to use them like sandbags against the rising sea?
Climatology is not a legitimate science. They need meteorologists.
They had better get hot on hiring some of these vital scientific experts.
Oh no! Whatever shall we do? I guess the land down under really will be down under water soon
I always view Engineering v. Science at the cusp of 1% of accuracy of prediction.
The Mann of the State Penn et. al. are not even within engineering prediction capability.
Snakes they are.
Shortage of what?
Faked data?
Poor analysis of the faked data?
Models that have NEVER proven correct?
Predictions that are laughable?
Yeah, Oz, you folks really need that.
So let us say that the oceans are rising. In that case of what earthly good would a climate scientist be? What you would need would be engineers and agriculture experts, etc. Climate scientists would add nothing.
Not enough climate propagandists to keep the lie afloat.
Pound sand “climate scientists.”
Putting out the Rat Lines.
They can have ours.
Any old hack will do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.