Posted on 08/01/2017 5:33:35 PM PDT by TigerClaws
In a settlement agreement, which reads more like an instrument of surrender, Bernards Township (“Township”), New Jersey officials agreed that, in addition to a $3.5 million payment to Islamic Society of Basking Ridge (“ISBR”), residents and citizens of the Township are prohibited from commenting on “Islam” or “Muslims.” at the upcoming public hearing to approve the settlement. Astonishingly, a federal judge approved the prohibition as a fully enforceable Order of the Court.
As a result of this suppression of speech, the Thomas More Law Center (“TMLC”), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, yesterday, filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Federal District Court on behalf of Christopher and Loretta Quick. The lawsuit was filed by TMLC affiliated New Jersey attorney, Michael Hrycak. Mr. Hrycak was assisted by TMLC staff attorney, Tyler Brooks. The TMLC is representing the Quicks without charge.
TMLC’s lawsuit alleges that Bernards Township’s settlement agreement constitutes a prior restraint on speech based on content, as well as, a violation of the Establishment Clause because it prefers Islam over other religions. The lawsuit asks the court to: declare that the settlement agreement is unconstitutional; and to enter a preliminary and permanent injunction against its enforcement.
Read TMLC’s entire Federal Complaint here.
The Quicks reside within 200 feet of the proposed mosque construction in a zoned residential area. Yet, the settlement agreement prohibits them from describing the many unique features of Islamic worship which will impact design of the building, traffic density, water and sewage, traffic control problems, road construction, and parking arrangements. According to the settlement agreement, ISBR is permitted to make statements concerning Christians and Jews and their places of worship, but in contrast, the Agreement prohibits commentary relating to Islam or Muslims. In fact, ISBR has previously discussed the Christian and Jewish religions and their places of worship.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented: “As we have previously documented, ISBR has taken the extraordinary step of concealing significant links on their website to a radical group named by the federal government as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism financing trial in America history, the Islamic Society of North America (“ISNA”). ISNA is claimed by the Muslim Brotherhood as one of “our organizations.” According to internal documents seized by the FBI, the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy is to engage in a “grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within . . .”
Thompson continued, “While claiming that the Township had a religious animus against Muslims, ISBR hid from the public view its animus toward Christians and Jews, by not only hiding anti-Christian and anti-Semitic verses published on its website, but also hiding its significant ties to ISNA. Instead of standing up to defend its citizens against ISBR’s hate-filled anti-Semitic and anti-Christian bias, the Township colluded with ISBR’s “Civilization Jihad” by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR, allowing the construction of the new mosque and Islamic center in violation of zoning codes, and now even suppressing speech concerning Islam or Muslims at a public meeting.”
In March 2016, ISBR filed a lawsuit in the New Jersey Federal District Court alleging that Bernards Township had discriminated against the Islamic Society when it declined to approve the construction of a large mosque on a lot that was far too small to handle the contemplated structure. And in November 2016, the United States represented by the U. S. Justice Department filed a second lawsuit against the Township on similar grounds. The settlement agreement covers both lawsuits.
Read the entire Settlement Agreement and Court Order here.
Bend over residents, you have been sold out and stuck with the bill besides.
COMPLETELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
NULLIFY AND REJECT THIS DECISION AND THROW THESE JUDGES OUT ON THEIR EAR!!!!!
Sounds like a job for massive nonviolent protest in the form of “piss koran” art.
what is the court going to do then, ban art??
“the Township colluded with ISBR’s “Civilization Jihad” by capitulating to payment of millions of dollars to ISBR,”
The Township is composed of people, all,of whom have addresses.
L
Use the term Muzzleman and Mohammedan religion. Maybe mOslem.
LOL
Will be overturned....
How about “The religion that must not be named”?
Just call ‘em “sand fleas”....
I don’t think we’re in America anymore, Toto. Obama left his Nazis to run this joint now.
Kudos to the Thomas Moore Law center, this federal judge deserves to be impeached.
That’s funny! Islam has conquered the Democrat party! And without even firing a shot! I didn’t know they could be defeated so easily!!!
So it must be true, the Last Days are upon us, if half the population can be so easily deceived by Islam
The suppression of the First Amendment is not as big as an issue as that $3.5 million check that what has to write to Islamic Society.
What about Terrorists or Murderers or Invaders?
The best the residents of that area can do is move. The judge is pathetic.
So they can say “Islam” but we can’t???
Kinda like............Well, you know....
Bad enough that this municipality thinks it can sell the Constitutional rights of its residents as though they were feudal serfs, but the real outrage is that a Federal judge once again tramples those rights. Trump needs to find a way to weed out these partisan hacks.
Court: Residents Can’t Mention “Mental Illness” or “Homeless” At Public Hearing on Half-way House Construction
Court: Residents Can’t Mention “Explosions” or “Danger” At Public Hearing on Dynamite Factory Construction
PC bull$hit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.