[SeekAndFind]

Why was this conclusion "inevitable"? Because the British government forcibly prevented any other outcome from even being sought, by refusing to allow the parents to take their child to foreign hospitals where he might receive experimental treatment for his condition treatment which even Phillips admits may, though a long shot, have made a difference, although no one can ever know for sure (thanks to the government's coercive prevention of such treatment). When the State says, "We are going to allow your child to die, and there is nothing you can do to stop us," then, yes, death becomes fairly "inevitable," doesn't it?

[miss marmelstein]

Melanie Phillips was NOT happy when I wrote that it was stupid to blame American Thinker (which has approximately 4 readers) for the Charlie Gard disaster. She sometimes answers her critics on FB.

Just a reminder: British conservatives are nothing like American conservatives. She loves her NHS.

[SkyDancer]

It was the UK legal system and the NIH hospital that killed that baby.

[Rinnwald]

It’s only false hope if we let it stop here. The state is not happy just having a portion of it’s population murder their children. They want to permanently break the most basic of human bonds by having the state step between parent and child.

Even during the dark days of Soviet communism, there was hope. That dark experiment lasted seven decades. Chinese communism cleverly extends itself by parasitizing off capitalism.

If whats left of the free world falls, then there is no hope for a very long time.

[Uncle Sam 911]

Britain’s exit doors were as tightly closed for this family as any exit door was ever closed in Stalinist Russia or East Germany. The British government deliberately ran out the clock to kill this child and that judge and those so called doctors will pay a high price for their murder of little Charlie Gard.

[Tammy8]

Yes. If they are so sure they are right about their diagnosis then they should have no issue with seeking other medical opinions and treatment. Before our death culture started taking over it was common for people to seek other medical advice especially if they were told nothing could be done.

My sister was born during World War II premature, and her digestive system could not tolerate milk, not breast milk or available formula recipes of the time. The doctor told my parents she could not survive but they should take her home and love her until she passed away. My parents knew they had to keep her warm so my dad fashioned an incubator of sorts near the wood stove, then the next issue was what to feed her. She could not keep milk down. My dad owned a sheep ranch and had Basque herders working for him. One of them told my dad to get milk goats and give her goat’s milk right out of the goat, not to mix it with anything or try to keep it. My parents tried that and it was a success! In the beginning my dad had to milk a goat every 2 hours round the clock for her feedings.

My sister grew up healthy! She did have health issues when she was little like pneumonia because her lungs were not fully developed, but my mother managed to keep her going through several bouts of that and then antibiotics became available to get her past that.

The Basque herder knew about goat’s milk being such a great milk for babies and easy to tolerate for sick babies because that is what they did for babies in the Basque region where he grew up. In this country then the thinking was there was no way to save preemies that had feeding and other issues and at least the doctors where my family lived were not trying to save them.

No one tried to keep my parents from trying other ways to save my sister after medical people had given up. In fact the doctors followed her progress closely and even started recommending goat’s milk for other babies with milk tolerance issues.

To think that some people now do not have the right to seek other opinions or treatments is insanity and to me proof they know they are not always right but don’t want any light to shine on that. I can think of no other reason why they would fight to keep people from seeking other opinions or treatment.

That is what bothers me the most about this story, in the beginning there should not have been a battle to allow other doctors to examine the baby. It should be criminal the way it all happened. Possibly the baby could not have been saved anyway but what would it have harmed to try? I think the harm that concerned the authorities that fought it was harm to their agenda. If the baby had been able to be treated then others would want to make their own medical decisions and they can’t have that.

[Gene Eric]

The sociopathic UK bureaucrats can go to Hell along with those in the media that facilitate their malice.

[Darksheare]

Wonder how much the british NHS made by selling his organs.

[Sam Gamgee]

Melanie, who I once thought of as conservative, has drunk the DHS Kool-Aid.