Posted on 07/30/2017 10:00:48 PM PDT by be-baw
Two bloated groups that should have their own bailouts cut at the roots.
All insurance companies should have to cover 100% of their risk liability in precious metals. The government should NEVER subsidize/bailout insurance companies or policy holders.
Agree. We need to face reality that about 40% will not qualify for an individual plan or will have a preexisting condition excluded or pay 150% more, etc. I can state back in 1980 after a person had been cancer free for 5 years I could insure then at a 50% premium increase. After 10 standard. I found a Medicare supplement in 1985 or 86 for my father, who had cancer, that covered cancer plus preexisting conditions after 90 days. That was a great plan that paid like 250% of Medicare allowable in most areas, etc. It cost about $600 then.
He can’t rescind Congress’ exemption, it’s baked into the bill, not an exemtion issued by executive order.
It’s not just ins companies but PIG PHARMA too. And their paying docs to push their latest crap drugs.
When older cheaper ones have proven to work, have less side effects for most of them.
I’ve got a full typed sheet of these new drugs that I react badly to.
Hubby was on Provachal which is now a generic, for his cholesterol worked well, but not fast enough for his primary who was a cholesterol control freak, put him on a double dose of Crestor, 80 mg, 40 mg is max. He was jerking like some one took a cattle prod to him and having leg, arm muscle cramps multiple times a day/night, the kind that bring you awake screaming in pain. He’s back on Provachal and Whelcol which makes his hands shake and effects short term memory, well give up some of that candy and carps you stuff down on a daily basis and your Tris will go down. Drink more water. Then you can have your 1 beer for supper, and the 1 small Scotch/Water before bedtime to help ease the aches and pains of being 77.
I would rather we go to a full free market and make these payments to those impacted by the manipulation of health care insurance for the last 30 years directly to pay for their health care that would phase out with their death.
By exposing future generations to paying their true cost of decisions we would all be a healthier society and we wouldn’t have the mess we have today.
This is fake news.
Trump does not want to declare war on the insurance companies and in fact is trying to free them and us from Obamacare.
Not saying there won’t be some friendly fire when trying to kill the beast though.
Trump should tell the insurance companies to back-off or he’ll support single payer. The thought of spending the rest of their lives working the drive thru at Burger King should help to get their minds right.
Insurance is about a cost for a risk and how to cover that cost.
But one elephant in the room is NOT about basic risk but the constantly rising cost, not of “insurance” but healthcare itself. It is healthcare and its often outrageous cost that is the main driver on health insurance costs.
The second elephant in the room is government mandates that dictate that “insurance” for various healthcare needs MUST be part of a policy. THAT increases RISKS that such needs will be obtained and have to be covered - adding to ALL premiums cost.
“Insurance”, other than for major catastrophic healthcare services is actually the wrong way to have healthcare services paid for. ALL it has been doing is to “insure” the healthcare providers will get their money, no matter what it is, without a squawk.
What is needed is for a big % of premiums to go into a health savings account, from which, the consumer, bargaining with the healthcare provider, pays directly for most services. Should a catastrophe happen, their premium has been “insuring” some coverage for its costs.
The healthcare industry will be faced with consumers directly, not the “insurance” industry for payment for most things. That will also greatly reduce their administrative costs of adjudicating “coverage” against many different insurers rules.
The main thing is to get the consumer acting as they should be able to, as a direct market force on what healthcare providers can get away with.
We would see a breakdown of the health care industry AWAY from “the hospital” being as central as it is and tons more specialized providers actually competing to get those consumer dollars UNCOMPLICATED by “insurance”.
The amount of money involved.....they would figure out a way for him to have an accident.
First of all, the word is "they're," as in "they are..."
Second, what do you know about "crap drugs?" Are you a doctor, pharmacist, or a scientist that develops them? Are you medically trained, or do you understand anything about pharmakinetics or pharmacology?
All drugs have side effects, some may affect person more than others. It's the balance and trade-off we make in order to treat diseases. If your husband was being treated by his doctor and that doctor decided to choose another treatment option, that's a positive. It means that the doctor isn't complacent, and is willing to try newer, often more advanced options. Sometimes these are more efficacious, sometimes they have better side effect profiles. Those profiles are developed from statistically-significant populations. If your husband reacted, that's unfortunate, but it doesn't mean the drugs are "crap."
Pharmaceutical companies make medicines because there's a need. Could people improve their health through exercise and diet? Yes, they could, but even the most healthy people get sick. Sometimes, older medicines can work just fine, but just remember, all generics were a brand name at one time.
That is what we had in 1980 with Mutual of Omaha’s One Million Dollar Major Medical. You picked the deductible from $100- $2500. The plan paid 80% after your deducible to 5K. After 5K it paid 100% of Dr.’s and in Hospital. Back then office visits were $15 and pills were cheap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.