Words fail me...
1 posted on
07/23/2017 10:21:33 PM PDT by
Kriggerel
To: Kriggerel
God bless him. His reaction to the movie is similar to D-Day vets who saw the Normandy landings in “Saving Private Ryan”.
2 posted on
07/23/2017 10:30:26 PM PDT by
laplata
(Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: Kriggerel
Wow. That is profound in every way.
Now I do want to see it.
To: Kriggerel
Wonder what his thoughts are on the moocher muslim rapist invasion...
4 posted on
07/23/2017 10:37:12 PM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Kriggerel
Good for him, I was just in Alberta. Nice people.
6 posted on
07/23/2017 10:48:15 PM PDT by
GnuThere
To: Kriggerel
You mean to say he didn’t think it sucked because it had no diversity, or Churchill, or an absolutely linear storyline?
Dang.
8 posted on
07/23/2017 11:32:49 PM PDT by
ExGeeEye
(For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
To: Kriggerel
I appreciate this man and I am sure the moving was incredibly moving for him, emotionally. But for my part, as a movie, it isn't that good. Zero character development, almost no dialog, at times rather slow, and Hans Zimmer"s interminably long, drawn out, constant bass chords (primarily cellos and pipe organs). If you saw Interstellar, then you're familiar with his "music" - blaring, ponderous, and for the most part, lacking any discernible melody. And maybe it was just the poor balance of the sound system in the theater, but much of what dialog there was, was drowned out by the score half of the time.
And while director Christopher Nolan does a good job of conveying the sense of dread, and of feeling like a hunted animal, the film does very little to really explain why Dunkirk happened. For example, if Germany's idea was to destroy the British Expeditionary force on the beach with the Luftwaffe, why do we see only a single Henkel bomber, three Stukka's, and two or three Messerschmitt 109"s? Where was the might of the Luftwaffe, and why wasn't it brought to bear? The film doesn't bother to explain. Nolan also spends far too much time on the Spitfire pilot and the aerial combat, though it is well done.
Not saying it was terrible, but it is hardly "the greatest WWII movie ever made", as a review in Rolling Stone suggested.
10 posted on
07/24/2017 4:30:34 AM PDT by
Sicon
("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
To: Kriggerel; Former Proud Canadian; JudyinCanada
OUTSTANDING!
Many Americans don't realize that Canada was in WWII about 2 years before we were.
To: Kriggerel
We saw it yesterday and enjoyed it even though we had to sit through a trailer for the new Al Gore movie.
13 posted on
07/24/2017 6:04:06 AM PDT by
stylecouncilor
("The future ain't what it used to be." Yogi Berra)
To: Kriggerel
I can understand the black community not being represented in the movie - heck, weren’t there black LGBT’s serving pancakes on the beaches during the evacuation?
16 posted on
07/24/2017 6:49:49 AM PDT by
SkyDancer
(You know they invented wheelbarrows to teach FAA inspectors to walk on their hind legs.)
To: Kriggerel
Very nice... going to see Dunkirk in IMAX tomorrow... To think there was a time when we won without a bunch of college educated guys who use gummie vitamins.. cuz real pills are hard to swallow.
20 posted on
07/25/2017 7:40:12 AM PDT by
momincombatboots
(White Stetsons up.. let's save our country!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson