That isnt my argument.
Lets be clear. You think he is already outside the scope
I think if he finds a trail he can follow it
I did not say it is a case of “ I am Robert Mueller so I can do anything I want”
I don't know what he is or is not pursuing, with any precision.
Our differences as to what Mueller's scope properly is, are previously expressed. You have not introduced any specific investigation to our argument, even as a hypothetical, but so far, you are true to the form I outlined. Whatever it is that Mueller is investigating, you see as within his scope.
You point to any news or speculation of what Mueller is investigating as validation of your point. No argument needed from your end. You assert he can follow any trail. Whatever he is doing is following a trail, and because he is following a trail, it is in the scope of his assignment.
Post to me when you find him out of bounds. Reminding me that you believe he is inbounds is a waste of your energy.