Posted on 07/21/2017 4:08:49 PM PDT by davikkm
Lunatic climate alarmist and liberal science propagandist Bill Nye says the world will eventually come to fully accept climate change is real, but we’ll ‘have to wait’ till the deniers are all dead.
Nye took on many new gimmicks in 2016-2017 in an attempt to salvage a career that was always sad and embarrassing, but the one gimmick that he pushes harder than his “gender” nonsense is his belief that climate change – of the non-scientific, Al Gore persuasion – is real.
In an interview Wednesday with the Los Angeles Times, Nye said that everyone will just have to wait for climate change “deniers” to “die” out.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
it is truly amazing....
Exactly what I was thinking — he and his leftist buddies will next be calling for our deaths.
Mind your language, please; there are ladies present.
You first, darlin!
Every time! Like clockwork!
Yep.
But when will Bill Dye ?
Lunatic climate alarmist and liberal science propagandist Bill Nye Bill Nye Nye, you get to Die First.
100%
He’s 61. Now, lets talk about who’s going to die first.
Liberals advance their agendas by controlling television, and controlling "education." If conservatives could exercise the same "freedom of speech" on Television, Liberals would be in serious trouble.
Guess you missed this:
Fox News: Tucker vs. Bill Nye the Science Guy
Feb. 27, 2017 - 9:22 - Bill Nye has argued that climate change deniers suffer psychological delusions. Tucker takes him on in an unforgettable debate #Tucker
How much $$ does the fake scientist make going on all of the TV shows and proclaiming climate doom? I think Nye is taking in Al Gore size profits on this scam...
The political mandate of climate science is a big problem. Any scientist who sees evidence contrary to the Gore mandates won’t get funded or published and don’t you dare criticize the PC journal articles.
CO2 is a “greenhouse gas” but we don’t know where the additional amounts become critical. The technology is here to mitigate mans production of CO2. Methane is an even more potent gas, the release of which in increases as polar temperature rises. Plus climate is in constant cycles of change. Another ice age would wipe out much of civilization. Chances are we’ll have one before we burn to death. However all these are forbidden generally out of bounds because the powers that be demand the destruction of all capitalist orientations in solving problems we aren’t really sure we have.
LOL. Sounds like a “call to arms” for the “enlightened” to go out and speed up the process of “deniers” dying out.
By gosh I think Bill Nye just threatened my safety!
Bill “close but not NYE” wouldn’t know his A$$ from his adiabatic. My physics degree hae more climate education than this bowtied nanny blowhard.
Mixing liberalism with logic yields this level of ignorance.
Scientifically speaking, “Not Nye” ain’t even close.
Soooo ... basically he’s saying, when everyone who disagrees with his bogus science dies, he will win the argument. Makes sense to me. If I hold a position and everyone else around holds to the same position, amazingly there is consensus agreement. This is a tautological argument.
The other way to say it, is, my bogus, unproven science is too unconvincing to change your mind. So, die, then I’ll be right.
how old is Nye? ‘cause we can just wait for the climatehysterics to die, too
That was a great event, but did it reach all the people to whom Bill Nye has spread his nonsense? I very much doubt that the audience that watches Tucker is the same audience that watches Nye.
To approximately rebut Nye's effect on the members of his audience, Tucker would have to reach the same group for something approximating the same amount of time.
The problem with the existing media structure is that they can spend much time advancing an agenda, and Conservatives have to spend at least as much on air time rebutting them. (yes, I know it's inexact, but I think you get the point.)
Consider this example of media bias in promulgating their agenda.
What would that look like if Conservatives were the News Anchors and reporters? It certainly wouldn't look like that, and the public would have different impressions about what was going on in the world than they do now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.