Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Architect of Paradise

The co-responsibility for the fetus begins with the act of procreation. The woman did not self-reproduce, so of course her partner SHOULD have SOME mutual say in what course the fetus will obtain.

But yes, in a general sense, irrespective of the abortion issue, I would find a woman has no responsibility to obtain any advise or agreement with the father of a fetus she is carrying when she is only pregnant because the man raped her.

Any law like we are discussing should employ both of those points - the man is a co-partner of the woman’s pregnancy had has some rights concerning the course the fetus will obtain, unless that man fathered the fetus by rape.

I do not include incest. If it is rape, it is rape, no matter the relationship between the man and woman. If it is not rape, and only incest, then the act was mutual, not forced, and the father’s rights should not be ignored.


38 posted on 07/18/2017 6:27:56 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

the father’s rights should not be ignored.
_______________________________________

what if the unmarried woman tells him shes pregnant and he tosses money at her and tells her to get an abortion ???


47 posted on 07/18/2017 9:56:33 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson