Posted on 07/15/2017 11:41:31 AM PDT by ColdOne
The Trump administration has told the Supreme Court that a lower court ruling earlier this week altering an executive order on immigration would bring thousands more refugees into the county and requires the justices’ “immediate intervention,” according to filing documents obtained early Saturday by Fox News.
In a victory for the administration, the Supreme Court late last month lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump's temporary travel ban on refugees and visitors from six mostly-Muslim countries.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Those are federal judges not state or local.
The number of federal judges impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate can be counted on one hand. Too many Democrats in the Senate for that too happen.
Few federal judges have ever been removed from office, it was never “fairly common” but extremely rare. Impeachment and removal is constitutionally very, very hard.
Damn right...... but there must be a deterrent to stop judges from doing this Paz Angel all that says the president has the power to remove any judge if it is a matter of National Security and Pastor now while we still have the house and the Senate
The Communists were far more conservative than the lunatic Left. It is not pursuing Communism but Nihilism as discussed in “Chaos and Mayhem”.
I think you have the best and only reasonable answer in your post 4.
The gods in black dresses don’t care about the law. They make it from the bench and Hitlery Rotten Clinton herself told them to #Resist Trump and his policies.
The peaceful transfer of power is over in America and Democrats are playing up the notion that they are the president(s) in exile.
America is FUBAR!
What he should does stop all immigration until they stop meddling, but he won't. He put up with those meddling midgets and let them make the rules for the President, bad move.
That is not true, it is just accepted by Congress since Marbury. Congress can pass legislation that is not subject to review and thy have done it many times.
Personally I think that congress likes the current method because it allows them to change the law then say the court has spoken and take no blame for it.
Just as expedient in this case, Congress has direct control over immigration. It could weigh in in either direction on this case.
Congress won't, it does all it can to avoid accountability.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.