See user comments:
Obamma must still be holding something over roberts' head.
hey chief chickenshit roberts...TELL IS AGAIN HOW THE OBAMACARE PENALTY IS ACTUALLY A TAX YOU SON OF A TURNIP.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: sickoflibs; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; stephenjohnbanker; Cboldt
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
The quintessential examples being Traitor Roberts 0Don’tCare rulings.
It was better when Roberts stayed silent.
3 posted on
07/07/2017 7:14:49 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Roberts is jealous of the attention Gorsuch is getting and is mad that Gorsuch appears so principled.
4 posted on
07/07/2017 7:15:33 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
he supports a consensus-driven approach to opinion writing in which the justices strive for unanimity and avoid writing their own concurrences or dissents. In doing so, he appeared to rebuke GorsuchWell, I guess we knew it. Roberts is part of the consensus driven swamp dwelling crowd that supports the collective over individual rights and liberties.
Gorsuch is a justice and no one can tell him he cannot write his own opinion on any matter that comes before the court. No one. Not even our ever esteemed, beloved font of reason and wisdom - it's a tax - Roberts, may god never let him live down the indignity.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Unanimity eh?
Howcum all those 5-4s, then?
6 posted on
07/07/2017 7:17:13 PM PDT by
lightman
(Trump = A glorious amalgamation of Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan!)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Unanimity eh?
Howcum all those 5-4s, then?
7 posted on
07/07/2017 7:17:13 PM PDT by
lightman
(Trump = A glorious amalgamation of Andrew Jackson, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan!)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Wait until President Trump nominates the next 3
8 posted on
07/07/2017 7:18:02 PM PDT by
McGavin999
("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Roberts is compromised.
Wonder how much he got for his Obamacare decision?
9 posted on
07/07/2017 7:18:37 PM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Traitor Roberts needs to resign so he can spend more time with his buddies on Malta.
10 posted on
07/07/2017 7:18:39 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Hey Roberts....why did you change your opinion on Obamacare in the middle of writing to side with the left. Highly unusual behavior. Someone owns Robert’s vote on the court. That is obvious.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Roberts is afraid that,as Justice Scalia did so consistently,Justice Gorsuch will prove himself to be the intellectual and judicial,superior of both him and his pals Ginsburg,Breyer,Sotomayor and Kagan.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Roberts is as smart as one can be with no wisdom, no sense of justice and no sense of humility.
In other words, he is your typical smarmy Harvard graduate.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
I repeat what I consider is the ONLY fidelity that the Supreme Court owes. It is not to the executive, nor the Congress, nor itself as an institution. It is only to the law as long as it does not abridge the Constitution and otherwise only to the Constitution. Preserving “precedent” and ruling unanimously is NOT a “Constitutional” imperative of the SCOTUS.
14 posted on
07/07/2017 7:22:29 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
This is from the epileptic goofus who gave us Obozocare. Scalia begged him not to side with it, now he attacks the new Scalia, Gorsuch. And what about those crazy leftist wacko broads, should they also speak with one voice?
18 posted on
07/07/2017 7:24:01 PM PDT by
Fungi
(Mucor roxii is not a rock band.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Dissents sometimes become tomorrow’s majority opinion.
Justice Harlan was the sole dissenter in Plessy v Ferguson, where the SCOTUS majority held that separate but equal should prevail.
That all changed some 50 years later when Brown v Board of education reversed the Plessy Majority.
Dissents to Roberts’ votes will surely become law someday too.
19 posted on
07/07/2017 7:24:11 PM PDT by
Sasparilla
( I'm Not Tired of Winning.)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
I guess that provides some insight into the decision Roberts made to turn his back on his oath of office and sacrifice his principles to side with the court’s leftists to protect Obama and Obamacare.
20 posted on
07/07/2017 7:24:53 PM PDT by
Vlad The Inhaler
(We were Trumpers before Trumpin' was cool !)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Most people are unfamiliar with the workings of the High Court, including the scribbler who wrote this article. The fact is that the Chief Justice has absolutely no say as to how other Justices on the Court involve themselves in the decision-making process regarding each case. In other words, each of the nine Justices may elect to write a separate opinion whenever he or she deems it appropriate.
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Hey! Roberts! Why don’t you lick the bottom of Gorsuch’s shoes?
Oh, you can’t, right? Not good enough....you traitorous nothing! You piece of low life scum.
24 posted on
07/07/2017 7:25:48 PM PDT by
KittenClaws
( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
This may be unprecedented. Cannot remember a SC head jurist ever publicly attacking one of the other jurists.
I suspect it is penis envy by the man who gave us obamacare as a tax.
At least Benedict Arnold was a hero of the revolution before he became the traitor of the revolution...
26 posted on
07/07/2017 7:29:28 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson