Russia has asked for proof of involvement in election interference

Wapo ^ | 7/7/17 | AP

[barmag25]

HAMBURG, Germany — Tillerson says after Trump-Putin meeting that Russia has asked for proof of involvement in election interference.

[barmag25]

Full title Tillerson says after Trump-Putin meeting that Russia has asked for proof of involvement in election interference

[Stopthethreat]

LOL

[Principled]

Finally!!

I wonder why nobody else has made this explicit request...

[colorado tanker]

I've been asking the same thing for months and the only answer I get is I'm supposed to take His Comeyness' word for it.

I'm sure Bobby Mueller will get to the bottom of it . . . Riiiight.

[a fool in paradise]

Ask CNN and MSNBC for their contacts in Ubama’s just-us dept. the dnc and silly-con valley.

[Mariner]

There is no proof!

None.

Zip.

Nada.

Bases clearing triple by Putin.

[ChicagahAl]

OK, Democrats. Here’s your chance. You’ve been screaming “Russia hacked the election”, for months.

Show the proof.

Hello? Democrats? Are you there? Hello?

[GilGil]

Finally! this is brilliant. Since this Russia meme started we have never ever been given proof.

There is no proof of Russian involvement and now Russia is calling their bluff.

This is a tag team of Trump-Putin which will crush the deep sate and the MSM. Trump is going to win so big on this Russia thing that we are in the pay-back stage of Trump’s administration. Trump will be vicious and merciless.

[Principled]

This will push the DNC server bring inspected as per trump’s earlier tweet today...

[a fool in paradise]

Series-ness of teh charge!

[onyx]

HAR!

Yes, by all means, let’s see the proof!

[BitWielder1]

Bummer. I thought/hoped Putin would say something like:
"Yes we interfered in your election. In favor of Hillary Clinton.
We failed. Now I'm glad we failed."

[thesharkboy]

Before a call for any proof, I'd like to know specifically what Trump and the "Russians" are accused of doing. What law was broken? What specific act broke that law? "Collusion" is not specific.

[tennmountainman]

Good luck with that Valad.
Trump has been asking for proof for months.

There isn’t any proof, because it never happened.

[mass55th]

Obama ejected 35 “suspected” Russian intelligence operatives from the United States, and imposed sanctions on Russia’s two leading intelligence services based on his Administration’s claims that Russia had interfered in the election.

I think Putin has the right to know the truth, and be shown the proof that Obama based his decision on. Oh wait...is that stuff archived in his future Presidential Library like Rice’s unmasking orders?

[Jim Robinson]

C’mon. It’s all over the mainstream media. If it’s in the paper, it must be true. Hillary said it happened and she wouldn’t lie.

[Tac Double Tap]

The very first thing Bobby Mueller should see is the proof himself.

[lodi90]

There is no proof of Russian involvement and now Russia is calling their bluff.

---

Not really. KGB Vlad is looking for some counter intel about how we know what they are doing.

[GilGil]

There is ZERO proof the Russians did anything. Trump said as much in his latest press conference.

[z3n]

It really just depends on what your operating definition of interference is. If you’re like much of the media, “interference” is synonymous with “influence”.... but if you only mean influence, then you can find all sorts of evidence of it from a vast plenitude of foreign and domestic entities.

To me, interference means you impeded the ability of US Citizens to vote. Seems like the lib media would take any legitimate reports of that kind of interference and run with it. Why not incident reporting?