It really just depends on what your operating definition of interference is. If you’re like much of the media, “interference” is synonymous with “influence”.... but if you only mean influence, then you can find all sorts of evidence of it from a vast plenitude of foreign and domestic entities.
To me, interference means you impeded the ability of US Citizens to vote. Seems like the lib media would take any legitimate reports of that kind of interference and run with it. Why not incident reporting?
3D chess.
Now Trump goes back. “hey dnc Putin wants an independent inspection of your hacked servers so we can get evidence Russia hacked them.”
DNC won’t cooperate as they’d be waiving rights as they likely have criminal info on the servers. Plus the entire Russian hacking always an invention to throw off Seth Rich suspicion.
So Trump checkmates the msm yet again.