Replies

“No I didn’t”

Yes, you did.

“I called you one dissenter.”

And that would still be incorrect no matter what.

“You are a master at changing what posters say to fit your agenda.”

I simply get things right. You don’t. You keep proving that in post after post after post.

“No, I acknowledged that the snippets from the column were/are important.”

And you denied that it was important to show evidence or corroboration.

“BTW, if you read the comments you will see that people that are not just interested in having a flame war with me (like you) have verified some of Ann’s truism with links.”

You’re the only one interested in a flame war. I didn’t even comment to you. I agreed with someone else. You started this.

“The column is received positively by 100K’ of intelligent people and there is one dissenter who would rather argue and twist the truth than debate.”

That’s you. You’re the only one here who is twisting the truth. I am not dissenting from Ann Coulter, for instance. You’re making that up out of thin air and that’s completely dishonest. Why are you doing that?

“I have never proved any of your mangled points.”
You prove all of them, all the time. You just did it now.

“Coulter is probably getting a chuckle out of your misdirections.”

She can chuckle over things that don’t exist. That’s her prerogative. You do not have the prerogative to make things up that are not true, however. And you’re doing it again and again. Why not just tell the truth? Are you such an enemy of just being honest?

“As you can see, you got your answer up thread.”

No, I didn’t since my question would be: “Why didn’t Coulter simply add evidence and corroboration to make her article even better and more convincing?” There is no answer to that question in this thread.

“For more documentation, go to this link and type in what you wish to have verified.”

And yet my point still stands – from the beginning – irrefutable, indisputable.

“It’ll all pan out.”

Your attempts won’t, however.