“Ok It’s time for you to read the article.”
I already did - yesterday no less. That’s why I wish Ann had posted some evidence or corroboration for this:
“He lost his license as a “pharmacy technician.””
But she didn’t. I believe her, but I wish Ann had posted some evidence or corroboration for it.
Or this:
“(He was not a “doctor,” despite the media’s insistent reference to him as one.)”
Or this:
“His Third World approach to meeting women resulted in his being arrested in 2004 for lifting a 23-year-old woman off the ground in Greenwich Village, while trying to penetrate her through her underwear and saying “You’re coming with me.””
Or this:
“Although initially charged with felony assault, he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor — otherwise he might have been deported and America’s beautiful mosaic would be diminished.”
Or this:
“In 2003, he was arrested for kicking in an ex-girlfriend’s door at 5:10 in the morning.”
Or this:
“In 2009, he was charged, in separate incidents, with harassing women by trying to look up their skirts.”
I did read the article. And I’m not the only one in this thread who noticed Ann Coulter didn’t include evidence and corroboration for many things she wrote. You claimed I was. You were wrong. Now read post #11.
Get back to me when you find the source for the quoted snippets fronm the column.
Good job so far, I’m proud of you.
No I didn't
I called you one dissenter.
You are a master at changing what posters say to fit your agenda.
“No, you get back to me when you find the source for the quoted snippets from the column. After all you just acknowledged they’re important - which proves my point”
No, I acknowledged that the snippets from the column were/are important.
BTW, if you read the comments you will see that people that are not just interested in having a flame war with me (like you) have verified some of Ann's truism with links.
The column is received positively by 100K’ of intelligent people and there is one dissenter who would rather argue and twist the truth than debate.
I have never proved any of your mangled points.
Coulter is probably getting a chuckle out of your misdirections.