Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

About time somebody asked that question.
1 posted on 07/01/2017 3:44:44 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

2 posted on 07/01/2017 3:48:19 PM PDT by Slyfox (Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

These facts are all public knowledge,so there is no reason for states to refuse to share it unless there is massive voter fraud in those states. Cut off all federal funds pertaining to elections to states that refuse to cooperate.


3 posted on 07/01/2017 3:49:56 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Placemark.


5 posted on 07/01/2017 3:57:19 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. FraOh, stnklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That is a lot of vote fraud in 25 states.


6 posted on 07/01/2017 4:04:53 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fake news.

The request specified that states were being asked to provide info as allowed by state law.

States not providing complete info because of this are not ‘pushing back’. How many are refusing because they are ‘opposed to the commission’ and how many of those 25 are actually cooperating to the fullest extent allowed by their laws?

So far, I only see 4 states which are actually refusing to comply. This is like push-polling, trying to get states to refuse because ‘everybody else is doing it’.

Love,
O2

*******TTTTTAAAAAGGGGGLLLLLIIIINNNNEEEE**********


7 posted on 07/01/2017 4:06:38 PM PDT by omegatoo (You know you'll get your money's worth...become a monthly donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“provide personal data on all registered voters” —

The actual request was for “PUBLIC” personal data. The states are pretending they are being asked to divulge private information, but they are not.

And yes, it is pretty clear that democratic states are not cooperating because they are afraid they will get caught.


9 posted on 07/01/2017 4:11:09 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

We all know what they want to hide.


10 posted on 07/01/2017 4:11:22 PM PDT by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Copied from another thread:

In California, as with all the other states, voter registration is for sale to any party. Here is a list of fields in the voter registration file.

Given that info (which includes, name, date of birth, and address), it would be really simple to cross-check that info with commercial credit-info databases to see if a given person is registered to vote in multiple places, and whether he has.

It would also be easy to cross-check if a registered person has paid taxes, or is a legal citizen -- things the Dems would NOT want to happen.

Knowing Trump, he has almost certainly already gotten all this info via proxies, using his own money, a long time ago, and already has had research done showing where the most fraud has occurred. This is most likely a trap for state officials, where they can be charged with obstruction of justice.

12 posted on 07/01/2017 4:16:28 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

New amendment via Aricle V Convention: all voters must report to polls with valid state or federal ID, including photograph & thumbprint, in order to vote in national elections. When states have their own elections, or local, who cares?


15 posted on 07/01/2017 4:30:53 PM PDT by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

KY Gov. Beving needs to find some way to circumvent SoS Alison Lundergan Grimes’ refusal to cooperate with Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. The SoS is a democrat and an admirer of Obama and a Hillary supporter.


16 posted on 07/01/2017 4:42:48 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Data on voter rolls are already public information which can be obtained by citizens or groups. Why doesn’t AG Sessions just subpoena the records from the States that are refusing to comply with the request of the Commission.

Kobach clearly explained a couple of days ago that they are only going to use the data to bump against other information to identify deceased people, multiple voting, illegal aliens, SSN fraud, etc. He also said the results of the findings would be made public.

Trump needs to come down hard on these refusals.


22 posted on 07/01/2017 5:22:49 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Anyone remember how the 55MPH limit was forced on us nationally?

All Federal shares of Medicaid and Expanded Medicaid should be witheld from states that refuse to co-operate until such time as they comply.


27 posted on 07/01/2017 8:59:44 PM PDT by Roccus (When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson