Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Mississippi SoS) Hosemann (R) on Trump voter ID request: ‘Go jump in the Gulf’
Mississippi Today ^ | 01 July 2017 | Adam Ganucheau

Posted on 07/01/2017 8:36:37 AM PDT by Drew68

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: abigkahuna

“Based upon further information, I have to adjust my thinking here.”

This is the INTERNET, pal, you’re not supposed to have an open mind. You’re supposed to call everyone an IDIOT if they say something that conflicts with what you think.

(LOL, I always admire people with an open mind)


61 posted on 07/01/2017 10:28:06 AM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

“Voter fraud is widespread through out the nation. No more “requests”, time to empanel a grand jury and issue fed subpoenas.”

Agree, but it does make sense to try to first shake loose the ones that are the worst - the ones that don’t comply. Makes it easier to deal with judges that may be open to both sides.


62 posted on 07/01/2017 10:30:33 AM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
Going back to my days sitting in my Con Law class, I recall that even though the States are constitutionally-mandated to conduct all Federal elections, the Supreme Court has LONG-LONG recognized a legitimate Federal Government interest, in both Congressional and (by extension) President elections. That's why the Voting Rights Act didn't get immediately overturned (as it should have), and that (unfortunately) is why both Obama and Trump are on firm constitutional ground precedent-wise - like it or not. What has NOT happened is any Supreme Court case which defines the LIMIT of Federal interest in Federal Government-related elections which any of these US States can cite. So, as things stand, the US States are in charge, while the Fed runs things, with only a sense of Constitutional decorum to limit it. (Please don't mention the Tenth Amendment because its force died the exact moment the ink that it was first written in dried.)
63 posted on 07/01/2017 10:46:27 AM PDT by Trentamj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
I thought we were supposed to be AGAINST the Federal Government interfering with local and state elections?

My thoughts, too. Really, these should just be about putting pressure on the States to fix their voter rolls. But the Feds have no right or power to request such - it isn't like opposing a poll tax or similar....

64 posted on 07/01/2017 10:48:13 AM PDT by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns; bigdaddy45

Ohh that is going to leave a mark. HEH HEH


65 posted on 07/01/2017 11:03:20 AM PDT by hawg-farmer - FR..October 1998 (------>VMFA 235- '69-'72 KMCAS <------- F4 PHANTOMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

hold on.

i empathize with both sides here. there is a fraud problem that needs to be handled.

but the Constitution does give the states the power to handle their own elections.

the Civil Rights movement somehow got the Feds deeply involved in the southern state’s electoral process, and while it certainly helped make sure people were not denied the right to vote, it has become a problem making sure the feds don’t become overtly involved in a state’s process.

we should tread carefully.

a compromise of some sort ought to be sought—or, perhaps, Hosemann is misunderstanding what is a benign request. He ought to want to be certain there is no fraud in the process.

I am just very concerned when the federal government get involved in what is a state matter.

Hope this makes sense.


66 posted on 07/01/2017 11:10:05 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Just turn off Mississippi’s EBT cards, and in 72 hours it will be an apocalyptic nightmare and they will overnight priority mail Trump everything he wants.


67 posted on 07/01/2017 11:16:33 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

There was considerable collusion in Mississippi between the corrupt Establishment RINOs (led by Haley Barbour) and the Democrats, centering on the despicable 2014 Senate primary race between Thad the Barnyard Cad Cochran and Chris McDaniel. They had large numbers of Democrats illegally flood the GOP primary runoff to install Cochran. The Feds taking a look at this would expose the corruption and collusion, and Hosemann appears to be going the extra mile to protect the morally bankrupt Barbourcrats in Mississippi.


68 posted on 07/01/2017 11:25:47 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
I thought we were supposed to be AGAINST the Federal Government interfering with local and state elections? Its so confusing being a conservative sometimes....

Protecting against election fraud is a listed function of the federal government. Constitution Article IV, Section 4:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
How does the federal government act to "guarantee ... a Republican Form of Government"? By vigorously investigating and punishing any form of vote fraud, or any attempt by state governments to not abide by the will of their citizens.

Note also "and shall protect each of them against Invasion" : what is happening with our borders, if not invasion?

69 posted on 07/01/2017 11:40:26 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

I’ll give 2 to 1 odds that Trump hands this weeny his a$$.


70 posted on 07/01/2017 12:06:01 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Has the Senate to request the information and then send in the FEDS


71 posted on 07/01/2017 12:38:24 PM PDT by okie 54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Name, address, DOB and Social Security Numbers = ID fraud.

As far as I am concerned, this is very confidential information. : (

72 posted on 07/01/2017 12:40:45 PM PDT by Chgogal (I will NOT submit, therefore, Jihadists hate me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
I thought we were supposed to be AGAINST the Federal Government interfering with local and state elections?

The law requires them to interfere with Federal elections. Custom requires the democrats to steal every vote they can.

I wonder some times how any sane person can think that any elections today are any more honest than a faro wheel in the old West.

73 posted on 07/01/2017 2:12:34 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Sounds like he just threatened the Presidents life.


74 posted on 07/01/2017 3:08:52 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

National voter ID(As much as I would hate that) and an end to early voting.


75 posted on 07/01/2017 8:28:33 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE
I am not keen on national voter ID and firmly believe that voting should be in person on voting day. I don't think there should even be absentee voting. Voting should be by paper ballot with uniform (within each state) positive ID.
76 posted on 07/01/2017 8:42:36 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I like that


77 posted on 07/01/2017 9:14:56 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: niteowl77

Well said. I remember articles from a few (couple??) years ago about the primary with Daniel and Cochran.

Dirty rotten politics there.


78 posted on 07/01/2017 9:30:51 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Half the truth is often a great lie. B. Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson