Posted on 06/25/2017 6:50:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
Daniel Greenfield reveals why theres no mystery behind the Democratic loss in Georgia, while Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and the George Washington University Profiling Project Deepen the Mystery of the Russian Hacking narrative.
There was a great deal of press this week about the District 6 Georgia Congressional race in which once again -- for the fourth time -- the hyped referendum on Trump produced a Republican victory over a Democratic challenger in a special election.
As usual, David Burge tweeted the most succinct wrap up of the left-wing take on their latest failure to recapture Congress and impeach Trump:
David Burge @iowahawkblog So I gather GA06 has suddenly gone from Enlightened Sunbelt Suburban Panera Voters back to Inbred Reactionary Neo-Confederate Klansmen
When hyping the Ossoff-Handel race, the media regularly misrepresented the district (Newt Gingrichs former seat) as rock-ribbed Republican when in fact it has become more Democratic due to redistricting, and the race was tighter than represented. But as Daniel Greenfield alone -- observed, the race was hyped as winnable only to fill the Democratic coffers. It was never likely that Jon Ossoff, a pajama boy who didnt even live in District 6, was going to beat Karen Handel, a well-known and respected District 6, resident no matter how much money the Democrats spent there.
So why did the Democrats pour $31 million down the drain to advance his doomed candidacy? Daniel Greenfield explains: the DNC is badly short of cash and spun this (and the three losing races which preceded it) to raise cash for itself and its infrastructure.
Most of the money came through Act Blue, the big DNC fundraiser. And much of the money raised went to Canal Partners Media Mothership Strategies and Mission Control, Inc. the Democrats infrastructure.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Yep. Someone made money off of that estimated $25 million that was donated to Pajamaboi. Who enriched themselves?
Amazing numbers, Osshoff only (that are not complete!):
...Nearly $11.2 million on producing, printing and reserving air time for political ads on TV, in local newspapers such as the AJC and in mailers sent to voters mailboxes
More than $492,000 on salaries for 170 different people a massive operation for a House contest
More than $1.7 million on polling, focus groups and fundraising consultants
Almost $439,000 on get-out-the-vote outreach...
Democrats and their fraud shemes is less startling than what is being admitted by DWS. Not only did she call Jeh Johnson a lier, but also said the DNC never knew they were hacked. That last part is important. Before you call DWS a lier, remember a woman scorned will bring down the house. I say give her a soapbox and let her sing.
The campaign managers make money whether they win or lose. As they say no matter if my candidate wins or loses just as long as the check cashes.
....When hyping the Ossoff-Handel race, the media regularly misrepresented the district (Newt Gingrichs former seat) as rock-ribbed Republican when in fact it has become more Democratic due to redistricting...
That’s what this 6A race boils down to, and an explanation of the Democrat misrepresentation that there was a big 20 point gain over Republicans due to a rejection of Trump and conservative ideas and a growing popularity of democrat resistance.
Just a blatant example of misrepresentation and lies endemic to democrats and liberalism in general.
ROTFLOL.......Burge nails it, alright.
The skeevy Ossoff ran as a "humble, kind " Democrat....calculated to appeal to millenials.
Trouble is unemployed millenials live in their parents' basements.
Dem Canvassers knocked on doors to proselytize them, but the parents called cops to chase the aggressive Dems off their property........as voters at the polling stations told Ossoff to get lost.
LOL.
==============================================
PAPER TRAIL EXAMPLE: the Obama admin announced on Oct. 7, 2016 that the theft and release of DNC emails was part of a widespread campaign intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.
Looking back, this Oct move by Obama was clearly intended to fend off his collusion w/ then-DNC head Debbie Wassermann Schultz, in the Pakistani spy network on Capitol Hill.
The buzz is the Pakistani Muslims were hired by Debbie Wasserman Schultz----she got them security clearances and humongous salaries and helped them abscond....
The more you examine the Paki/infiltration, the more you sense that D/W/S did not act alone on this......(that fact does not exonerate her treasonous activity).
This gal D/W/S is super-ambitious. She actually has a spreadsheet of those that "owed her" .......people she did favors for.
D/W/S was especially keen on getting into the good graces of the half-caste Royal Idiot b/c it suited her crass self-serving ambitions.
Strangely enough, on the surface it seemed like the half/caste kept shrugging her off.....as she pursued him w/ a vengeance.
Distilling the info, one concludes, she was a willing "doer of tasks," but he had to give the appearance that they were not connected.
The Pakis could not have (A) gotten security clearance, and, (B) could not have absconded without some pretty high-level help.
The grotesque salaries are also problematic.....could be one way she was paid off........campaign contributions, kickbacks, wire-transfers, and the like.
The Obama Admin is on-record, conniving to get federal oversight over state elections. Obamas henchmen have already probed Georgias voter database and probably have some dirty tricks ready to go.
DHS Jeh Johnson's and Obama's unauthorized attempt to breach 2016 electoral data. .... Georgia reported DHS made 10 attempts (to date).
=======================================
REFERENCE Georgia Says U.S. Govt Tried to Hack States Computers Housing Voter Data
WSJ / FR Posted by bryan999
The secretary of state of Georgia is asking the Department of Homeland Security to explain what appears to be an attempted breach of the states computer systems that house its voter registration database by someone in the federal government.
In a letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson dated Thursday, Georgias Secretary of State Brian Kemp said the state had discovered an unsuccessful attempt to breach the firewall of state computer systems. The attempt occurred on Nov. 15 and was linked to an IP address associated with DHS, he said.
At no time has my office agreed to or permitted DHS to conduct penetration testing or security scans of our network, wrote Mr. Kemp, a Republican. Moreover, your department has not contacted my office since this unsuccessful incident to alert us of any security event that would require testing or scanning of our network.
We are looking into the matter. DHS takes the trust of our public and private sector partners seriously, and we will respond to Secretary Kemp directly, a spokeswoman for DHS said.
===============================================
DHS Secy Johnson's $41.2 billion budget did not include "election activities." Taxpayers demand to know where the DHS billions are going.
FREEPER ACTION PROJECT--
Contact your Representative and Senators Capitol Switchboard 1-866-220-0044
cont
cont
Obama Administration Plotting to Usurp Control Over Elections
New American ^ | 8/18/16 | Alex Newman / FR Posted by Nachum
Under the guise of providing increased security for critical infrastructure, the Obama administration is plotting to insert itself and the federal government into the American elections process.
While voting is constitutionally the responsibility of state and local officials, Obamas Homeland Security Secretary, Jeh Johnson, pointed to the alleged threat of cyberattacks to justify the latest proposed usurpation of power.
The controversial scheme was floated amid growing national concerns, fueled in part by GOP presidential candidate Donald Trumps warnings of a rigged election, that Americas electoral system might be vulnerable to major manipulation. Critics and experts, though, warned that the White House scheming may be a first step toward illegally nationalizing the electoral process with all the dangers that would entail.
Homeland Security boss Johnson, a leading luminary behind Obamas illegal amnesty plot, has said repeatedly said in recent weeks that the administration was thinking of issuing a decree declaring elections to be critical infrastructure in need of supposed federal oversight and protection.
We should carefully consider whether our election system, our election process is critical infrastructure, like the financial sector, like the power grid, Johnson told reporters in Washington earlier this month. Theres a vital national interest in our electoral process.
In a phone call with state officials, he reiterated those comments, offering help with elections. (Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
State officials not done fighting federal intrusion into local election systems
Thanks much for the pings.
The democrats have a tremendous behind the scenes infrastructure that consumes money by the boatload. It must be fed. The DNC has no money to feed it. The Clinton foundation isn’t getting money anymore and paying the “staff”. After the November off year elections are done, there will be a significant dry period for this infrastructure. They will demand money from the DNC and prominent dems; thus draining the coffers even more. Qatar and China are going to be much less willing to pony up the money for the dem machine.
AND the ones who don't live in their parents' basement voted Trump and attend his rallies chomping on chewing gum...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.