Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Justice Kennedy Contemplating Retirement
PJ Media ^ | June 24, 2017 | Rick Moran

Posted on 06/24/2017 4:51:20 PM PDT by jazusamo

The Supreme Court announced on Friday that it will publish its final rulings for this term on Monday. Some significant cases, including the possibility the court will hand down a decision on the legality of President Trump's travel ban, will be decided.

But Washington is rife with rumors and speculation about the future of Justice Anthony Kennedy and whether or not he will retire after the term. Kennedy is 80 years old and said to be seriously considering the idea of stepping down. If he did, it would set off the mother of all confirmation battles. Kennedy has been the all-important swing vote on the court, casting the pivotal fifth vote on legalizing same-sex sex marriage and upholding abortion rights.

Conservatives would dearly love to see one of their own replace him — which is why liberals are expected to mount a titanic battle to prevent that.

CNN:

"As the court's most important Justice -- at the center of the institution's ideological balance -- Justice Kennedy's ability to bridge the divide between left and right on critical issues such as the right to access abortion cannot be overstated," said Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center. "Replacing Justice Kennedy with a Trump nominee would almost certainly sound the death knell for Roe, just as candidate Trump promised during the 2016 campaign."

But nine years later, he sided once again with the liberals on the court to strike down a Texas law that abortion rights supporters thought was the most strict nationwide. Without Kennedy's vote, the law would have been allowed to go into effect, inspiring other states to pass similar legislation.

In the same term, Kennedy pivoted on the issue of affirmative action when he voted for the first time in favor of a race-conscious admissions plan at a public university.

After that term, former acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said, "It is very much Justice Kennedy's Court."

"You can't understand how important his affirmative action opinion is without understanding his earlier jurisprudence," said Katyal. "For decades, he has been the court's most eloquent voice on the need to be color blind -- why he changed his mind is something historians will debate for decades."

However, sometimes Kennedy voted with the four conservatives on the bench. It was Kennedy who penned the majority opinion in Citizens United v. FEC -- striking down election spending limits for corporations and unions in support of individual candidates.

He's also sided with the right side of the bench on issues such as gun control and voting rights. Kennedy joined Chief Justice John Roberts' 2012 opinion, Shelby County V. Holder striking down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

And Kennedy sided with George W. Bush in the case that essentially decided the 2000 presidential election for the GOP candidate.

Liberals will do everything in their power to stop anyone President Trump nominates from taking his seat on the court. All of their pious, weepy rhetoric about the Constitution that we heard during the months that the Merrick Garland nomination lay fallow will be forgotten as they wage a ferocious fight to keep the seat vacant.

But in the end, they don't have the votes in the Senate to stop the president from naming pretty much whomever he wishes.

Justice Neil Gorsuch has yet to put his imprint on the court and some of the cases that will be handed down Monday may give us an inkling of just how conservative he is.

Los Angeles Times:

On Nov. 30, with one seat on the court still vacant, the eight justices heard arguments in a Los Angeles case on whether noncitizens who face possible deportation can be held in jail indefinitely or instead have a right to a bond hearing after six months. The case, Jennings vs. Rodriguez, has taken on added importance in the Trump era, but the long delay may signal that the justices are split 4-4.

If so, the court may announce Monday that the case will be reheard in the fall, leaving it to new Justice Neil M. Gorsuch to cast the tie-breaking vote.

Also still pending, since January, is a California case that will decide whether a crime such as breaking into an empty home qualifies as a "crime of violence," triggering automatic deportation, even for an immigrant who is a longtime legal resident. A ruling in Sessions vs. Dimaya could affect thousands of deportations

The third case, pending since February, is a closely watched border shooting. At issue in Hernandez vs. Mesa is whether a U.S. agent can be sued for fatally shooting a 15-year-old who was standing on the Mexican side of the border.

If Kennedy retires, the president could name a relatively young conservative judge. And at least one other aging liberal Justice — Ruth Bader Ginsburg is mentioned most often — could also retire, giving President Trump the nearly unprecedented opportunity to shape the Supreme Court for a long time to come.

Elections have consequences.



TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dershowitz; justicekennedy; kennedy; losecruz; retirement; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: snarkytart

If Ginsburg was so worried about POTUS and his politics...


She wasn’t that worried. She believed “the fix was in”.

Now, she probably has nightmares where she doesn’t wake up and Trump has appointed Ted Cruz...


41 posted on 06/24/2017 5:46:01 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: fatima

Exactly, my FRiend! Thankfully the Dems chose her. ;-)


42 posted on 06/24/2017 5:47:13 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They should be nervous. They went out of their way to shape the court into an oligarchy.


43 posted on 06/24/2017 5:47:50 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima

I wish that the Clintons and the Obamas would just go away.


44 posted on 06/24/2017 5:50:00 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Frankly, you are very right. We got lucky. If the Democrats had put up someone with a pulse, well who knows what would have happened. Still, though, I think Trump resonated with real America, not the takers, the aliens, the hate-America people. It is my belief that somewhere, someone watches over America. He allows for the occasional buffoon, but when we really, REALLY need it, he puts the right man in the right position.
45 posted on 06/24/2017 5:50:39 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Do one thing good in your life, you liberal puke. Retire and let the president appoint an originalist to save our country. You have been a disgrace.


46 posted on 06/24/2017 5:52:11 PM PDT by NoKoolAidforMe (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Even though they have no idea who will be nominated to replace him, the Democrats already have their talking points ready to go:

"I cannot, in good conscience, support this candidate"

"He/she is too far out of the mainstream"

"I have serious questions about his/her past statements regarding _____"

"His/her position on the issues of ____ and ____ raise grave concerns about his/her fitness for the high court"

His/her ties to ____ should disqualify this person from consideration"

47 posted on 06/24/2017 5:52:45 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

The Wide Latina can actually make some cogent arguments.

Kagan is just a libtard hack with no judicial experience.


48 posted on 06/24/2017 5:57:11 PM PDT by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ginsburg made a mistake by not quitting
when Obama was prez.

to save face, she has to claim that her intention
was always to serve as long as she could.


49 posted on 06/24/2017 5:59:35 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

.
We don’t need her “Cogent arguments.”
.


50 posted on 06/24/2017 6:02:34 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Too old.


51 posted on 06/24/2017 6:02:50 PM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: trisham

They will be replaced.I have a Friend who is friends with Justice Kennedy.They meet once a month he strings them along IMO.Ego Ego Ego.


52 posted on 06/24/2017 6:05:35 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

He’s only 78. He could easily live to be 95 to 100. I have multiple friends whose parents lived to be that age.


53 posted on 06/24/2017 6:06:35 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: fatima

That kind of narcissism (Clintons and Obamas) is not so easy for many of us to comprehend.


54 posted on 06/24/2017 6:08:30 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’d rather it were Ginsburg or Breyer, but if we can get a reliable justice in place of the wobbly Kennedy, I’ll take that.


55 posted on 06/24/2017 6:10:58 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Elaine Kagan.


56 posted on 06/24/2017 6:11:46 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
mitch has been grinning like the cat who ate the canary...
& he has
57 posted on 06/24/2017 6:13:45 PM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Practicing lawyers generally think the opposite. Kagan is quite smart and a good lawyer. Sotomayor’s legal reasoning is not nearly as good. Judicial experience is not that important. It’s brains and knowledge that matter.


58 posted on 06/24/2017 6:29:26 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: trisham

That would be a very imprudent appointment.

The odds of him having more than 5 years on the job are slight. President Trump needs to pick a justice in his/he 40’s-50’s so that the position can outlast President Trump’s presidency and solidify a conservative court for the next 20 years.


59 posted on 06/24/2017 6:32:33 PM PDT by JayGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

:) Trump ahh.Prayers.Crazy ride.


60 posted on 06/24/2017 6:36:59 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson