Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Deals Blow to Property Rights
Reason ^
| 6/23/17
| Eric Boehm
Posted on 06/23/2017 2:20:20 PM PDT by Sopater
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kennedy in the majority opinion, while conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito joined Chief Justice John Roberts' dissent. The Supreme Court's newest member, Justice Neil Gorsuch, did not participate in the case.
Even if Gorsuch had been there, it couldn't have changed anything.
This is a disappointing day for those of us who cherish liberty.
1
posted on
06/23/2017 2:20:20 PM PDT
by
Sopater
To: Sopater
2
posted on
06/23/2017 2:23:07 PM PDT
by
RummyChick
(can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: Sopater
4
posted on
06/23/2017 2:28:25 PM PDT
by
rey
To: Sopater
Why not join the two parcels and have it valuated (with improvements) as a single lot?
To: Sopater
Kennedy and Ginsberg will be retired by God’s will soon. Justice will have to wait for that good day.
6
posted on
06/23/2017 2:31:05 PM PDT
by
txrefugee
To: Sopater
Comrade, why do you resist? All your property belong to the state.
(and yes, Please retire comrade Kennedy)
7
posted on
06/23/2017 2:31:11 PM PDT
by
jonno
(Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
To: Sopater
I agree. What a travesty of justice.
Nice to see Roberts pulled his head out on this one. I guess the full house on the other side did give him a chance to seem reasoned though.
8
posted on
06/23/2017 2:31:38 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Fourth estate? Ha! Our media has become the KCOTUS, the Kangaroo Court of the United States.)
To: Sopater
Bigly.
Pray for a true change on SCOTUS. This disaster goes along with the New London decision as a travesty for private property rights.
Think, though, if DJT can appoint and replace just TWO of these foul liberals...Breyer and Ginsburg especially... today’s unconstitutional wind can be reversed.
To: Sopater
So disappointed in Kennedy. He usually takes the libertarian view, but went with Big Brother today.
To: Sopater
"But the vague nature of the test established by the Court makes it very hard to figure out exactly when that might happen."(emphasis mine).....or if ever.
11
posted on
06/23/2017 2:35:33 PM PDT
by
yoe
(Keep focused Freepers andspeak out for POTUS ... investigate Maxine Waters, Ilijah Cummings, Nancy P)
To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
Because the idea was to sell the undeveloped lot to fix up the other lot, not sell both of them.
12
posted on
06/23/2017 2:36:32 PM PDT
by
chaosagent
(Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
To: Sopater
13
posted on
06/23/2017 2:36:41 PM PDT
by
KyCats
To: RummyChick
I don’t trust any branch of government any more.
14
posted on
06/23/2017 2:37:17 PM PDT
by
djpg
To: Sopater
“The property was appraised at $400,000 before the Murrs tried to sell it.”
How could that be when the regulatory taking occurred in the 1980s? Did their appraiser not know about it?
15
posted on
06/23/2017 2:38:05 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Sopater
“Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kennedy”
The usual suspects.
16
posted on
06/23/2017 2:39:15 PM PDT
by
SharpRightTurn
(Chuck Schumer--giving pond scum everywhere a bad name.)
To: Sopater
Well, well, well. What a surprise out of John “Obamacare” Roberts.
To: Sopater
“Justices Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and Sonia Sotomayor joined Kennedy in the majority opinion”
All the usual suspects.
To: Henchster
not hug, rode out of Town on a fresh split, wooden splintery wooden rail.Dang! Those splinters get in the darnedest places,
19
posted on
06/23/2017 2:43:27 PM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country.)
To: BenLurkin
There is your problem - what valuation of land or even a house is valid? Better not sell it to the county it might create a tent city for Somalian refugees on it.
20
posted on
06/23/2017 2:43:35 PM PDT
by
arrogantsob
(Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson