Wasn't the FBI also refused access to DNC servers? Not that you'd ever get an honest answer from combey about that...
1 posted on
06/21/2017 10:12:06 PM PDT by
867V309
To: 867V309
Yes, I believe you are correct.
And the FBI based their “the Russians did it” on the unsubstantiated findings of a private company.
Yeah... Thats the ticket...
2 posted on
06/21/2017 10:22:58 PM PDT by
marktwain
(President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
To: 867V309
Ya' think ?
The Democratic National Committee REFUSED to allow their computers and servers to be searched for evidence.
WHY ? I propose that
the Democratic National Committee hired Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas to do the hacking to search for evidence against their opponents in the 2016 election,
and also had them hack the Democratic National Committee's own computers and servers, so as to remove suspicion from the DemocRATS.
Consider the following information about the SO CALLED Russian Hacking.
I believe it was
the Democratic National Committee who was DOING the hacking and leaving FALSE TRACES of the Russians.
We MUST INVESTIGATE the Democratic National Committee's servers ! ! !
Let's review a few pieces of history, such as:
Now based on the articles linked above, I propose to you that it is VERY POSSIBLE AND CREDIBLE
that the Democratic National Committee, under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF,
hired Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbasto hack those computers,
and to place false flags to make it look as if the Russians did the hacking.
On the other side of the issue is:
Now, I trust former Senator Jim DeMint, and I trust Rush and Glenn.
But all former Senator Jim DeMint has is
the document he was shown and briefed upon, and they came from a corrupted agency under Obama and his minions.
In closing, let me make it clear that
I strongly believe that document and other sources were generated by Amid Awan, Jamal Awan, Imran Awan, and Rao Abbas,
while they were working for he Democratic National Committee, under the direction of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Hillary and Bill Clinton, and the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF .
Imran Awan, target of a House security probe, worked in IT for Rep. Andre Carson, a member of the intelligence committee
Former President Bill Clinton with alleged Muslim Spy Imran Awan
Wasserman Schultz Threatened Police Chief For Gathering Evidence On Her IT Staffers Alleged Crimes
THE AWAN BROTHERS PAKISTANI/AMERICAN INTERNET SECURITY TEAM
Obama Placed ISLAMIC SPIES in the Federal Government. Details Are Treason.
3 posted on
06/21/2017 10:23:02 PM PDT by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: 867V309
[Wasn't the FBI also refused access to DNC servers? Not that you'd ever get an honest answer from combey about that...]
yes. The DNC told the FBI to go away, and then used a group called “Crowdstrike” to investigate the supposed hacking. Crowdstrike said it was Russia. Only trouble is Crowdstrike blamed Russia before and they were proven wrong.
IMO we should not trust that the DNC wikileaks hack was Russia. All we have is the DNC’s word and this Crowdstrike bunch who have been wrong before. Not nearly enough.
4 posted on
06/21/2017 10:25:08 PM PDT by
Cubs Fan
(Liberals are the most hateful, violent and intolerant people in America)
To: 867V309
[Gowdy: Maybe DNC Did Not Cooperate With DHS Because There Was Something Else On That Server]]
Cpt Obvious gets one right for once
5 posted on
06/21/2017 10:26:46 PM PDT by
Bob434
To: 867V309
6 posted on
06/21/2017 10:28:00 PM PDT by
jospehm20
To: 867V309
Yes, Republicans need to go on attack with accusation after accusation and there are plenty of them. Do not fear the democrat/media, it is a Paper Tiger.
7 posted on
06/21/2017 10:28:39 PM PDT by
arrogantsob
(Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com)
To: 867V309
16 posted on
06/21/2017 11:16:59 PM PDT by
Ray76
(DRAIN THE SWAMP)
To: 867V309
Wasn’t the FBI also refused access to DNC servers? Not that you’d ever get an honest answer from combey about that...
Yes they were denied. But then you give them a subpoena force them to turn them over.. They didn’t turn them over because they were not hacked by anyone.. Somebody leaked the DNC server emails..
To: 867V309
Gowdy lights a candle so media can see the sun.
25 posted on
06/22/2017 1:06:33 AM PDT by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: 867V309
Jeff Sessions needs to appoint a Special Counsel to look into all of Obama's and Hillary's
Crimes. But he won't.
Bank on it.
29 posted on
06/22/2017 2:16:34 AM PDT by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
To: 867V309
One, if the Republicans started acting cohesive group as the Democrats do and stop the infighting they could stop this charade. Two, anyone from school athletic departments to military strategist know the best defense is a good offence.
The Republicans in congress remind me of a bunch of cowering dogs running around whimpering with their tails tuck tightly between their legs
32 posted on
06/22/2017 3:47:56 AM PDT by
okie 54
To: 867V309
33 posted on
06/22/2017 4:35:21 AM PDT by
Chode
(My job is not to represent the world. My job is to represent the United States of America-#45 DJT)
To: 867V309
Well DUH, Trey!! You are worthless as a prosecutor!
34 posted on
06/22/2017 4:49:01 AM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: 867V309
I have read that Crowdstrike investigation was led by a former FBI head of cybersecurity. Thoughts:
1) Ex-FBI guy was a partisan Democrat or Crowdstrike would not have hired him, or the DNC trusted him.
2) Ex-FBI guy backchanneled info to Comey.
3) Ex-FBI guy is the key to unravelling this.
So why doesn’t Mr. Gowdy have the Crowdstrike lead investigator deposed under oath in private then brought in to testify on his actions and findings? Questions like: Did you investigate and eliminate the possibility that an insider took the data rather than an outside hacker? How? Any particular suspects? Any data or discussion about Seth Rich? Have you ever communicated on this matter with former Director Comey? When and what exactly? Did anyone suggest that your report find that “the Russians did it”? Who?
To: 867V309
FBI couldn’t investigate Clinton Fund with any sense of reality, because Comey as General Counsel of Lockheed donated their money to it.
Without recusal he would just whitewash the blatant payforplay. Essentially what happened.
45 posted on
06/22/2017 7:31:42 AM PDT by
Titus-Maximus
(It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
To: 867V309
Make Wasserman-Schulz testify along with Comey.
47 posted on
06/22/2017 7:34:39 AM PDT by
Solson
(Trump 2020!)
To: 867V309
Wow! Nothing gets past him, does it?
50 posted on
06/22/2017 2:11:16 PM PDT by
MayflowerMadam
("Negative people make healthy people sick." - Roger Ailes)
To: 867V309
Now that the Russia collusion fantasy has been proven false and democrats have sealed up all the evidence of their criminal activity, I can see no reason keeping Trump from dismissing Mueller and thanking him for his service.
52 posted on
06/22/2017 8:14:34 PM PDT by
Baynative
( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
To: 867V309
March 2014 : As the United States faces a Cold War showdown over Russia annexing Crimea and an international passenger jet having seemingly disappeared, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson met with leaders of the terrorist support group Code Pink at Homeland Security headquarters in Washington, D.C. on Monday.---Homeland Security Chief Swoons Over Terrorist Support Group CODE PINK Asks For Medea Benjamins... The Gateway Pundit ^ | 3/18/14 | Jim Hoft Posted on 3/18/2014 9:35:30 PM by Nachum
54 posted on
08/28/2017 1:26:19 AM PDT by
piasa
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson