Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

First thing I thought. Would it be Constitutional to allow a “special” class to protect themselves but not everyone else.


11 posted on 06/19/2017 11:14:55 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Terry Mross
Would it be Constitutional to allow a “special” class to protect themselves but not everyone else.

It's a lot worse than that.

Since the 2A is NOT for personal protection, but rather for protection from governmental tyranny... this law would grant protection FOR governmental tyranny, by arming government at the expense of the people.

18 posted on 06/19/2017 11:26:11 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson