it uses examples which have little to do with the subject at hand.
the ‘topic at hand’ involves the usage of violence as a means to desirable political ends...exactly how is the article deceptive in that regard...?
A lot of the violence cited isn’t politics. We have had a pretty good record of peaceful transfer of power in the country...until TODAY of course. The article is mostly the same old keftist diatribe agains the greatest Culture and Nation to stand astride of history. Sure we’re plenty flawed...until you look at any alternative ever tried.