Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luircin

What would I do? I wouldn’t have promised to “immediately” stop something I intended to actually delay stopping. He said he’d stop it “immediately” but somehow in your and others’ minds now “immediately” doesn’t mean “immediately” it means sometime down the road.

Ok. Fine. Just don’t try to sell *me* this line because I’m not buying at any price.

I never believed he’d stop either EO to be quite honest so I’m pleased he nixed DAPA. I’ll give him credit there. And I heard him say on multiple occasions we have to have a heart, we will let the good ones back in, etc, so it’s certainly not a surprise he doesn’t appear to be rescinding DACA anytime soon. Not a surprise at all.

But he never should have said something if he didn’t actually intend to do it. Again, “immediately” means “immediately”, not months if not years down the road when it becomes easier to do.

Why can’t you just admit that he hasn’t come through on the promise of “immediately”? I can’t for the life of me understand why that’s so hard to admit. It isn’t hard to admit for anyone who’s more interested in the truth than winning an argument.


136 posted on 06/16/2017 12:04:03 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: FourtySeven

You never answered the question other than self righteous virtue signalling. And lots of whining.

How would you deal with the political fallout? How would you deal with the logistics? Which bills would you sacrifice in order to pay for the support you’d lose from Congressional cucks?

Answer the question instead of wetting your panties all over FR.


145 posted on 06/16/2017 2:13:32 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson