New rules to allow police to fingerprint children as young as six [Germany]

TheLocal.de ^ | 15 June 2017 17:33 CEST+02:00 | DPA/The Local

[Olog-hai]

Authorities will in the future be allowed to take the fingerprints of refugee children as a young as six when they first enter Germany, interior ministers agreed on Wednesday.

State and federal interior ministers, who met in Dresden on Wednesday, said that the current minimum age for taking the fingerprints of a child would be lowered from 14 to six. The move was justified as a means of preventing asylum seekers from applying twice for protection.

But the change was harshly criticized by legal experts. “We don’t have a security problem among children,” said Sven Rebehn, chairman of the German Association of Judges. “We need to be careful not to go too far and end up eroding the rule of law.”

Another new measure agreed upon by the interior minister conference that drew attention was the decision to allow police to spy upon messaging platforms such as WhatsApp. …

[BenLurkin]

Better idea: Don’t let them in.

[AlaskaErik]

“We don’t have a security problem among children,” said Sven Rebehn, chairman of the German Association of Judges.

You will as they get older. Plenty of these children grow up hating the country that took them in after their parents escaped the hellhole third world countries they were originally from.

[reasonmclucus]

Finger prints are useful for identifying kidnapped children.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Re: Stupid critics of this law. How do you know who a lost refugee child is if you don’t log them in when they come into the country? That would require a photograph, finger/palm and foot prints, if only for their safety.

I’ve given up on most Europeans. They are cowards, stupid, wimps, Sharia-bend-overers, and reds (of all stripes).

My wife is weeping for the Europe of the 1950’s/early 60’s where men were men, women were women, and there were churches everywhere, with attendees. Plus the streets were safe for women, there were no “No Go” zones, and terrorism was literally unheard of.

I was safer in Vietnam and Cambodia, and the people were fighters, not feminized wusses.

[a fool in paradise]

>>
The move was justified as a means of preventing asylum seekers from applying twice for protection.

But the change was harshly criticized by legal experts. “We don’t have a security problem among children,”

---

You apparently have multiple ADULTS presenting the same kiddos as “theirs” to seek asylum as the “parentals” of the yutes.

Also I wonder how many “asylum seekers” are getting benefits to take care of those yutes. Getting on the dole several times for the same kid is indicative of fraud.