Trump’s FBI Pick Backed Mass Detentions After 9/11

thedailybreast.com ^ | Betsy Woodruff

[RoosterRedux]

[Cincinnatus.45-70]

It begins to sound like an excellent choice.

[left that other site]

The INS detained more than 700 people who the FBI suspected could have been linked to the 9/11 attacks. According to the watchdog report, issued by the Justice Department’s inspector general in April 2003, almost all were men, mostly from Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, India, and Yemen. They had all committed some sort of immigration violation, either staying longer than their visas allowed or entering the U.S. illegally.

Evidently, based upon subsequent events of treason and terror that have occurred since 9/11/01, they didn't enforce the LAW nearly enough.

[HLPhat]

While his boss covered the arse/exit of his Saudi pals.

I forget, do the Saudis and their royal milk and apple connoisseurs have a history of due process?

[HLPhat]

>> they didn't enforce the LAW nearly enough.

Sure looks that way.

"Oops"  

[Former Proud Canadian]

"Trump’s FBI Pick Backed Mass Detentions After 9/11"

Good. Sounds like we are moving in the right direction.

[Dilbert San Diego]

According to the watchdog report, issued by the Justice Department’s inspector general in April 2003, almost all were men, mostly from Pakistan, Egypt, Turkey, Jordan, India, and Yemen. They had all committed some sort of immigration violation, either staying longer than their visas allowed or entering the U.S. illegally.

---

So how the heck were any civil rights violated, if all these people were picked up on immigration violations; if they all were picked up for legal violations????

[Sacajaweau]

During WWII, Russians were housed at Fort Ontario. It became a self sustaining community...but they were not free to integrate into the general population. They were suppose to return to their country after the war.

It's a great story about the wisdom of dealing with AND PROTECTING victims of a major war.

The story is worth googling.

[Red Badger]

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Nowhere does this imply that the rights guaranteed to our citizens, as part of the Bill of Rights, are required to be extended and given to NON-citizens, who may be enemies in disguise. The Constitution is not a suicide pact..................

[sport]

So did I. I said that every muslim over here needed to be deported immediately. If what he favored had been implemented, there are a lot of people pushing up daisies now that would have been walking around now. But as long is it is not my [collectively]head that they are cutting off or not me[collectively] that they are killing and raping, it does not matter. “My ox is not the one being cored so I [collectively] don't give a damn.”

[CygnusXI]

I misread... detonations.
Good either way.

[Principled]

Meuller needs to be destroyed in the court of public opinion. They’d do it. Alinsky his ass off. Ruin him. Ruin his wife. Ruin his business.

It would be best to do it with anonymous leaks.

[VietVet876]

Sort of reminds me of the movie “The Seige” made pre-2000.

[Jim Noble]

Trump’s FBI Pick Backed Mass Detentions After 9/11

I like him already.

[Nifster]

Precisely

[HLPhat]

Nowhere does this imply that the rights guaranteed to our citizens, as part of the Bill of Rights, are required to be extended and given to NON-citizens

...in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of it's protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination.

From “Thomas Jefferson, July 27, 1821, Autobiography Draft Fragment,” page 538

https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/connections/thomas-jefferson/history3.html

 

What does this mean?

 

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=former+muslim+women&t=hz&iax=1&ia=videos

If we don't protect their right to unmask the fraud of Islam... then who will?

[Nifster]

Too bad sooo sad

[Red Badger]

From 1776-1778, Jefferson served in the Virginia House of Delegates. In 1779, he was elected governor of Virginia and was reelected in 1780. His autobiography discusses the need in the years following the Declaration of Independence to revise Virginia laws to purge them of the remnants of colonial laws. He proposed a number of revisions to the statutes while in the House and later, as governor, continued his efforts to secure passage of these reforms. The Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom proposed during Jefferson’s tenure in the Assembly and finally passed in 1786 was among his proudest accomplishments. In his autobiography, he explains:

The bill for establishing religious freedom, the principles of which had, to a certain degree, been enacted before, I had drawn in all the latitude of reason & right. It still met with opposition; but, with some mutilations in the preamble, it was finally past; and a singular proposition proved that it’s protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word “Jesus Christ,” so that it should read “” departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion” the insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of it’s protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination.

From “Thomas Jefferson, July 27, 1821, Autobiography Draft Fragment,” page 538

[HLPhat]

” in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of it’s protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and infidel of every denomination.”

What do you think that means?