Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fantasywriter

What makes it legal is that it wasn’t classified - not that Comey did it through a third party. Or at least that’s Comey’s reasoning. Had the memo been classified then it would have clearly been illegal. And is there ANYONE who believes this is the only thing Comey leaked? ~crickets~


58 posted on 06/08/2017 11:11:46 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

Someone posted elsewhere that Comey had previously testified that he hadn’t leaked certain information. The point I’m making is that a hair-splitting legalist like Comey would take very special care not to implicate himself. If he described leaking an item publicly (he did) it would have been done in such a way as to let him off the hook.


60 posted on 06/08/2017 11:16:48 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Inernet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity

I think it could be illegal since it was for the purpose of causing the hiring of a special prosecutor which infers that there is a crime involved.


66 posted on 06/08/2017 11:30:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson