Skip to comments.
Tired of losing the Rust Belt, new Democratic group has strategy to un-Pelosi the party
Vox ^
| 5/30/17
| Jeff Stein
Posted on 05/31/2017 4:37:46 PM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Didn't the RATS just democratically elect San Fran Gran because she was the most qualified and that it was her turn - again?
To: Libloather
The party of death needs to be remained who their cheerleader is...KATHY GRIFFIN!! Bam!!
To: Libloather
3
posted on
05/31/2017 4:41:04 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(Where's Reagan when we need him? Look in the mirror - the spirit of The Gipper lives within you.)
To: Libloather
“We have really not led with an economic message that transcends the whole spectrum of voters who would benefit from Democratic policies.”
Is this a variation on the idea, that people are too stupid to know that they should vote Democrat, due to allegedly superior enlightened Democrats policies???
And if that is the case, what does that say about the Democrats, that they lack the ability to convey their allegedly superior policies to the voters?? Isn’t that what campaigns are supposed to be about, convincing voters to support your party or candidate???
To: Libloather
5
posted on
05/31/2017 4:42:35 PM PDT
by
Faith Presses On
(Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
To: Libloather
6
posted on
05/31/2017 4:43:00 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: Libloather
What’s worse than being “...job locked”? (Pelosi)
Getting you hours cut the 28.5 per week....AND losing your healthcare!
7
posted on
05/31/2017 4:45:43 PM PDT
by
Fitzy_888
("ownership society")
To: Libloather
The Vox site is typical of most Lib websites, no comments section. I’ve noticed a reverse correlation. The more “liberal” the site, the less likely a comments section is provided. It fits the Lib concept of a “conversation”, which is to say they’re speaking, you riffraff shut up.
8
posted on
05/31/2017 4:46:41 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
("Daddy, what did you do in the Deep State War?")
To: PGalt
>>LOL! Run, Maxine, run.<<
warren/waters 2020! Or pelosi/waters 2020!
Either one! Please!!!
9
posted on
05/31/2017 4:47:59 PM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(The Civil Rights movement compared content of their character to skin color and chose the latter)
To: Libloather
Candidates running under the People’s House Project will be able to say they’re of a different cast than Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, Ball said. And exactly how would Bella Pelosi and Chuck U Shumer react when these folks defy the whips and vote with the GOP?
To: Libloather
Also, I thought white working-class voters were irrelevant now? You know, demographics is changing the country, all the right-wing racists will die off, and all the new brown voters will make the Left a permanent majority
At least, that’s what leftists tell me.
11
posted on
05/31/2017 4:50:28 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Libloather
Yeah, Pelosi doesn’t speak for them!
Maxine Waters does.
No wait, Chuck Shumer does.
No wait, Chris Murphy does.
No wait, Barbara Mikulski, Kirsten Gillibrand, Al Franken, Maria Cantwell, Richard Blumenthal, Tammy Baldwin do...
Oh never mind. Pelosi does...
12
posted on
05/31/2017 4:50:39 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Happy days are here again!)
FReepers, it's time to get serious about retiring this FReep-a-thon.
President Donald J. Trump and the Free Republic of the United States of America
Ramirez political cartoon: the Price of Freedom LARGE VERSION 05/28/2017: LINK LINK to regular sized versions of his political cartoons (archive).
Please join the monthlies, an automated way to help support Free Republic.
If you are not opting to join the automated monthly support program, please consider joining the One One Done project. LINK
FReepers, 66.01% of the Second Quarter FReep-a-thon goal has been met. Click above and pencil in your donation now. Please folks, lets end this FReepathon. Thank you!
...this is a general all-purpose message, and should not be seen as targeting any individual I am responding to...
Just $870.00 to 67.00%
13
posted on
05/31/2017 4:54:21 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Happy days are here again!)
To: Gay State Conservative
And it’s just a bunch of bullsh1t! I know YOU know this GSC... But, to get it on record...
It’s BS because they can *say* they’re a different cast than Pelosi and Schumer, but those two ARE RUNNING the democratic party. Not Ball or anyone else. Schumer and Pelosi are the highest ranking democrats in office in the USA today.
Every single Republican running ought to wring the democrats necks with those two.
Wanna prove ‘em wrong? Elect new leaders!!!!
Otherwise, it’s just talk.
Thanks, Vox! You just gave us our “stratergery” for 2018!
14
posted on
05/31/2017 5:08:31 PM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(Keep fighting the Left and their Fake News!)
To: Dilbert San Diego
The Dems tried this a few years ago, recruiting alleged moderates to run in swing districts. After they got elected the party made them vote straight down the Obama/Pelosi line. I think they're all gone now.
Don't be fooled again, voters.
To: Libloather
Dem cronies and criminals: “Hey VOX, we want to put a different face on the same old scams”
VOX: “We’re here to help!”
16
posted on
05/31/2017 5:25:40 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: Libloather
Pelosi is the Democrat’s John McCain.
To: colorado tanker; LS
"The Dems tried this a few years ago, recruiting alleged moderates to run in swing districts. After they got elected the party made them vote straight down the Obama/Pelosi line. I think they're all gone now."Yes, and FR-er "LS" has discussed this in 2006 and if my memory is correct they ran on we don't like the wars but we are Pro-Military / Service Men and Women.
Tangent to this I saw a Schumer CSPAN interview right after they took the House and Senate in 06 and he outlined their strategy. They started in PA and went westward into OH and other states and picked off districts they felt this would fly in. Tangent to this I had found a map of districts with breakdowns by religious affiliations. I compared it to the districts they picked off. Son of a Biscuit, the predominant faith in those districts was Catholic. I am not sure that was by design or not, and I kick myself I didn't download the reference material I found on the web.
Note, this is not an anti-Catholic rant etc etc, but you look at it and it jumps out at you. More importantly are these districts ones that PDJT carried in 16 and are Catholics a large part of this WWC / Swing voter that is in PDJT's camp. I'd need an updated map by faith/Districts, if one even exist today if someone is actually still putting one together...
18
posted on
05/31/2017 5:52:12 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
To: colorado tanker; LS
BTW tanker, I don't see the Dem's taking the House and Senate in 18', I read this article the other day, and I still don't think they get the mid-west blue collars. I can only think of one issue they could win on and no I am not gonna even say it. All the others the Left is trying to foster medical pot, more socialized medicine aka Obamacare on Steriods, Gun Control, the T in LGBT, none of these are as appealing as jobs, jobs, jobs and no, that is not my winning issue.
19
posted on
05/31/2017 5:58:13 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
To: taildragger; colorado tanker; LS
20
posted on
05/31/2017 6:05:29 PM PDT
by
taildragger
(Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
