Perhaps. But since we dont vote in their districts they can safely ignore us.
Perhaps. But since we dont vote in their districts they can safely ignore us.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Which I have been saying for a while - If they don’t directly represent you, you shouldn’t be able to give them money.
Why should people in ‘Texas’ be allowed to use their money to influence a dog catchers race in ‘Virginia’?
It just allows the cost of the elections to rise and sort of takes it out of the locals hands when A Soros or Bloomberg or Koch etc etc can pour millions into races that seemingly don’t effect them...
So, this ‘reasoning’ that if I YOU don’t directly represent ME, that I shouldn’t be able to talk to you should just take the natural course in regards soliciting funds from me.