Posted on 05/21/2017 5:03:43 AM PDT by Kaslin
Now that House Republicans have passed a revision/repeal of Obamacare, the Left has turned convulsive. Predictions of bodies strewn on the streets and picked up on oxen-driven carts have been offered by elected officials who want us to take them seriously. Let us review the current state of health insurance in America.
What Obamacare did was six basic things:
The big issue that Democrats are scaring people about are pre-existing conditions. The facts are that only 10% of Americans (about 18 million insured) could possibly have a concern about pre-existing conditions. Everyone else had no concern because that was not an issue for people who had insurance through their employer, Medicare, Medicaid or the VA.
When Jimmy Kimmel went through his heart-wrenching rant about his newborns heart condition, he made multiple misstatements of fact. He stated his one-day old child would have a pre-existing condition which would disqualify him from insurance coverage. That child was covered by Kimmels health insurance which was provided by Disney -- with about 170,000 employees. If Kimmel remained there, the child would be covered until he was 26 years old or maybe he would get a job at Disney and never have to worry about his pre-existing condition.
Obamacare set up a special program to cover people denied insurance because of pre-existing conditions. That program covered a little short of 115,000 people in 2013 which was its peak. It was predicted back in 2011 that up to 129 million people were exposed for having problems with health insurance because of pre-existing conditions. The statement then and the fear tactics now are just lies to make people scared of the Republican proposal.
If you were one of the few people who will be able to get to the point that you are rejected by an insurance company for pre-existing health conditions, then the new plan passed by the House provides a $130 billion high-risk pool to help cover these people. Remember possibly just 10% of Americans would ever start to be exposed to needing the high risk pool, and few will ever get to the point of having to use this final protective step.
The high-risk pool is designed specifically to segregate individuals with significantly high risk medical conditions. That is because having these people as members of the general insurance population is gravely distorting the cost of insurance for everyone else. The proposal, which is not a new idea, allows the vast majority of Americans to lessen their insurance costs and the co-pays. The idea is to mitigate these extreme increases in insurance costs that occurred in 2017 and are expected for 2018. It will also bring more companies back into markets (more competition) because they will be better able to project their outlays and control their losses.
Instead of creating a better marketplace Obamacare destroyed the marketplace for health care by making it impossible for insurers to predict costs. Without that they cannot properly price their product. Thus, Obamacare provided Americans little or no competition for their insurance dollars and created soaring costs. In addition, the individual mandate that was supposedly forcing everyone to buy insurance was a near complete failure.
Why are Democrats crowing about the supposed faults of the Republican plan (AHCA)? What had been foisted upon Americans was either failing or already failed. Except for adding millions of people to a questionable Medicaid system, nothing positive was done. If the program was working so well, why did the death rate increase in 2015? Obamacare should have decreased death rates with more people provided health insurance and thus health care, but that did not happen. Death rates are just one indicator of its success, but an important indicator.
On May 5th, the devilish duo behind Obamacare Jonathan Gruber and Ezekiel Emanuel ran dueling dissertations in the Washington Post on how the Republicans are at fault for the problems with their dismal plan. If the Republicans only forced people to buy the health insurance they dont want on the exchanges, the plan would be saved. If Republicans only gave the plan more time the 2017 massive premium increases were a one-time adjustment of costs. If they only threw more money at insurance companies to underwrite their losses. Aetna has pulled out of the Exchanges. Blue Cross in Maryland, Virginia and D.C. has already requested a 52%, 35% and 29% increase for 2018 respectively. Maybe, Gruber and Emanuel should read the newspapers and get closer to reality. Aetna has already lost $500 million since 2014 on their failed plan.
The Democrats are crowing about a plan (Obamacare) where they lied to Americans about the basics of their healthcare (you can keep your plan and your doctor), which has crushed the competitive marketplace for insurance and driven up its costs and out-of-pocket expenses.
The plan desperately needed an overhaul, yet, they voted unanimously in the House to keep this damaged plan that was spiraling down and potentially out of control.
Instead of attacking Republicans with lies and innuendos, they should be trying to help. It appears they would rather expose all Americans to a collapsing medical insurance creation of their own doing for their own perverse political purposes. Americans will figure that out and make them pay.
I have to laugh. I see tons of patients with “insurance” and the comment on their chart is “deductible not met”. That means pay out of pocket, i.e. same as no insurance. OR patients who’s coverage isn’t taken by anyone in town. The only people who “love” their Obama care are the Medicaid freeloaders, and the folks with hefty subsidies on their premiums (also freeloaders), although most of them don’t realize they have zilch until that deductible is met....
The whole thing is ridiculous if you ask me. If the deductible is not met, then why have insurance. People are better of paying out of their own pocket.
It fills the role of a catastrophic plan.
“It fills the role of a catastrophic plan.”
I had a catastrophic plan purchased in the private market when I had a preexisting condition. The premiums for that pre Obamacare catastrophic plan were 25% of the premiums I now pay for a bronze plan. My deductible on my bronze plan is over 20% higher than my deductible under my old catastrophic plan.
Give me my old catastrophic plan as Obama promised. Yes I do remember the lie, “You can keep your old plan if you like it.”
In my experience, insurance with deductible not met is far different than no insurance. In the former case a $1500 charge for a procedure is reduced to $100 (for example). In the latter case, it is $1500 - period.
For O care policies they usually don’t pay dollar one till the deductible is met.
“What is A Health Insurance Deductible?
Your health insurance deductible is the amount you have to pay out-of-pocket for covered services before your insurance begins to pay. It doesnt include premiums, or costs that arent covered by your plan. Once you meet your deductible your plan will pay its share of your coinsurance.”
The hypothetical cheapest policy my wife and I qualified for had an 1800 dollar a month premium, and a 12000 dollar deductible.
ping
PLUS you're paying insurance premiums every month. So you have less money to pay for actual health CARE should you need it. It's much worse than having no insurance at all. Unless you have a catastrophic medical event. Even then, for many people a deductible of say $6,000 might as well be $100,000 or $1 million ... they can't afford it either way.
For many people it would be better to have a low-cost catastrophic plan with a low deductible which covers truly catastrophic events ... and pay for everything else out of pocket.
It was my understanding that a considerable amount of money was pulled out of Medicare to help finance the Obamacare fiasco. Didn’t see this mentioned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.