Couple of factors.
1. The Norge ships are only designed for 2x8cell Mk41. While that's enough for local area defence, it's a bit light if you want to carry ASROC or cruise.
2. SPY 1F is a 1st gen system, old hasn't been updated, and pretty much an orphan. It's also passive, heavy, power consuming and expensive
correcting all that will take time and money
OTOH, the basic F-100 while bigger (steel is cheap, air is free) is designed for 48 Mk41 cells. And Navantia is already working on a version with a cheaper, more modern, and cheaper active phased array radar system
. CEAMOUNT and CEAFAR-S are already operational and the initial phase 2 ship design is scheduled to be available by the end of the year.
The truth is this vessel is most likely to be built at either Bath Iron Works in Maine or Ingalls in Pascagoula, MS. Ingals has much more capacity. BIW has good political support and they do great work. Marinette Marine could still play into it, as could Austal, but I'd guess it comes down to the two I mentioned first, especially since they (1) were not part of LCS and (2) are the ones that are most impacted by any end to Burke class production.
My prediction: they will pick a design (probably F-100 since it's more suitable than the National Security Cutter) and then split production between those two yards with BIW as the lead yard. You heard it here first!