Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monorprise

May be wrong here, but the value of the land the Feds wanted, may have bee the reason for the concession of more acreage.


4 posted on 05/10/2017 6:47:19 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

According to Dunn, we can make more money on the Federal land hes trading for than we ever made on the land hes trading away.

The point is the theory, Dunn make this arrangement during the Obama administration. If we could just get Trump in on the deal we might be able to get a lot more than twice as much land from the feds.

This could be a backdoor way to reclaim the western territories that a friendly administration might take advantage of instead of hoping congress will surrender the land.


6 posted on 05/10/2017 7:12:06 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

“Commissioner Dunn expressed concern that a delay of 60 days or more from the current time table will push the closing date past the end of his first term and possibly put the exchange in the hands of another land commissioner who may not support the trade. ...”

Seems like this is analogous to not letting Obola appoint a SCOTUS Justice. If this is indeed a good deal, the new Land Commissioner will see it the same way.


10 posted on 05/10/2017 10:45:19 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson