Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump moves to get more conservatives on federal bench
Associated Press ^ | May 8, 2017 | VIVIAN SALAMA

Posted on 05/08/2017 6:58:51 PM PDT by Kaslin

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Trump administration on Monday named 10 judges and other law professionals it plans to nominate for key posts as President Donald Trump works to place more conservatives on the nation's federal courts.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said that among the candidates are individuals previously named on Trump's list of 21 possible picks for Supreme Court justice. All nominees would require Senate confirmation.

The announcement came less than a month after Trump's pick for the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch, was confirmed, restoring the court's conservative tilt.

Trump will nominate judges John K. Bush of Kentucky and Joan Larsen of Michigan for the bench of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. David Stras of Minnesota will be nominated for the 8th Circuit.

Amy Coney Barrett of Indiana will be nominated to serve on the 7th Circuit. Kevin Newsom of Alabama will be nominated as a circuit judge on the 11th Circuit.

Also to be nominated for federal court positions are David Nye of Idaho, Scott L. Palk of Oklahoma and Damien M. Schiff of California.

The president will also nominate two people for federal judgeships: Dabney L. Friedrich of Washington, D.C., and Terry F. Moorer of Alabama.

While appeals courts tends to have a lower public profile, their role in adjudicating many of the orders and laws put forth by the administration is significant.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: 115th; 2016issues; judiciary; presidenttrump; second100days; supremecourt; trump45; trumpscotus

1 posted on 05/08/2017 6:58:51 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Hmm, l wonder if AP ran a story when Obongo was stuffing the courts with radical leftists?


2 posted on 05/08/2017 7:11:08 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Excellent!


3 posted on 05/08/2017 7:13:48 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Name the same number tomorrow, Mr. President. And Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and after church on Sunday.

Start again next week.


4 posted on 05/08/2017 7:22:12 PM PDT by combat_boots (God bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! And please, God, bless the USA again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Conservative leanings of people Trump wants on the bench are the real measure of where Trump's heart is, not the deals he does to get what he can through Congress.

JMHo

5 posted on 05/08/2017 7:32:42 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

AMEN !


6 posted on 05/08/2017 7:35:00 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Tell this to Mr. George Will - we would not have gotten ONE conservative judge on the federal courts if that clown had his way and Hillary was elected.


7 posted on 05/08/2017 7:39:47 PM PDT by laconic (that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is the Senate required 60 votes or the 51? If they go the 60 then it is time for McConnell to change rules to 51 for these judges.
8 posted on 05/08/2017 7:56:58 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laconic
George Will and all the other "Conservative" pundits sold out a long time ago. Most when the Clinton administration was so tight with the media that they could deliver well concealed payoffs of all sorts to anyone they wanted to buy and the few who stayed the course during the Clinton years were bought off when their guy Dub was President.

Not only would I not waste my breath telling Will or anyone else of his ilk anything, I wouldn't unload my bladder on any of them if they were afire.

JMHo

9 posted on 05/08/2017 8:05:57 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I suspect be will seat more judges than other president in his 1st term...


10 posted on 05/08/2017 8:23:48 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Let’s hope so. The media, the LIBS and the anti - Trumper repubs will do whatever they can in their lunacy to oppose them all. Traitors...


11 posted on 05/08/2017 8:29:38 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

watch for the democrats to blue slip them all.


12 posted on 05/08/2017 8:34:29 PM PDT by Samurai_Jack (War is cruelty, there is no use trying to reform it; the crueler it is, the sooner it will be over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Is the Senate required 60 votes or the 51? If they go the 60 then it is time for McConnell to change rules to 51 for these judges.

I think I heard that it was 51. I heard it in the media so I am not sure if it is true or not.

13 posted on 05/08/2017 8:38:08 PM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I believe the USSC is the only thing that’s ever required 60 instead of 51.


14 posted on 05/08/2017 9:13:10 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

It’s 51 votes, thanks to Hairy Reed.


15 posted on 05/08/2017 9:34:08 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The GOP-e: supporting the Democrat agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

Yes, it is 51 votes needed in the Senate -— thanks to our good friend Harry Reid. :-)


16 posted on 05/08/2017 9:54:19 PM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He has a total of about 120 judges to fill across the United States. Good start. Long way to go. This actually would have been my first task as President to fill these vacancies.


17 posted on 05/09/2017 4:51:33 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

The composition of the courts is the CORE strategy here. Trump can err elsewhere where it can be later corrected, but a court’s decision is largely set in stone.


18 posted on 05/09/2017 6:47:00 AM PDT by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: laconic

Yes, remind Will sometimes ignorance is bliss for us as they knows that they don’t knows that they don’t knows.


19 posted on 05/09/2017 11:44:43 AM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

there are like 20 openings for appeal courts,
80 or so for district courts.

or not,
somebody please post the numbers


20 posted on 05/09/2017 7:56:16 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson