Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: itsahoot
You said this, "Do you remember when Trump came out strong against PPP? Remember the next day he said he talked to Ivanka and she told him about all the good things PPP does for women's health so he backed up on shutting down PPP, he has not repositioned to his former stance.", HERE.

I took your comments to mean, "...so he backed OFF on shutting down PPP, and he has not repositioned to his former stance...", to mean this.

It wasn't my intent to misrepresent your emphasis HERE. I don't think I did.

What I tried to do is remind you of his actions related to funding for abortion, directly and indirectly related to the Right to Life, and Planned Parenthood.

I touched on his actions related to international funding of institutions that backed or took part in abortion. I touched on his actions related to helping states that wanted to withdraw funding from Planned Parenthood. I touched on his actions related to defunding Planned Parenthood from the federal government.

His actions are about as clear as it gets, with regard to a statement of intent.

He is doing everything in his power to end government support for abortion.

I never saw him as intent on shuttering Planned Parenthood. What it does with any private funding it gets, is up to it. Short of a SCOTUS decision on the matter, Trump has done everything he can.

He HAS NOT been ambiguous on the matter.

170 posted on 05/08/2017 3:39:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Happy days are here again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
He HAS NOT been ambiguous on the matter.

Afraid he has as far as the public is concerned. There will be an election before we see some of the positive results of these executive actions and we could lose the House on a couple issues.

Everyone doesn't read FreeRepublic and the little EOs and reg changes are never heard by the voters. The things that people hear are related to healthcare and the border and he needs to bring the battle to his new friends.

We fuss over withholding funds from Sanctuary cities and never mention they are breaking several federal crimes, why is that? We let a district Judge claim they have issued a precedent decision on immigration not based on the law but on what Trump may do in the future, why is that? I watched Governor Richards today continually state Trump-Russian collusion was a fact right after testimony was given in the Senate saying no evidence of such existed.

Why do we give any money at all to PPP when the give money to every democrat idiot running? It is a slush fund for the libs and we never talk about that, tax payer funded commie politicians.

Trump was not elected for who he is, but who he was not, it matters bigly.

172 posted on 05/08/2017 7:58:49 PM PDT by itsahoot (As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson