Did Oswald act alone - or on loan? Or did he not act at all?
The Zapruder movie sure makes it look like Kennedy’s being shot from the side or the front, as his head moves “back and to the left.” Maybe that’s his head’s muscular boomerang reaction from being shot from behind (ie from the book building), but is it fair to disparage people as nutty for believing their “own lying eyes”?
Ari killed Johnny so he could marry Jackie.
The people who react that way to being shot from the front or side are movie stuntmen. Of course, in such cases they aren't actually being shot. So, yes, your eyes are lying.
If ever I am called to account for the use of a firearm, may the Lord spare me from a trial by jurors whose whole understanding of firearms is shaped by TV and movies.
I'm sure that Oswald was involved, but that film makes it hard to believe that he was the ONLY one involved.
It's actually hard for me to believe that the muscles could move his head back so violently.
Analysis of the rifle shows that Oswald did not shoot the president. First it was a terrible weapon. Second it was supposedly taken to New Orleans back to Texas to be stored in a blanket. Third there was no evidence that it would even have worked since the Army Ordinance Lab was reluctant to even shoot it because these experts believed it might explode. Fourth there is no evidence that Oswald ever bought ammo for it. Fifth, and perhaps most important no one ever saw LHO practicing with it and the sight attached to the rifle was so inaccurate that the sights had to have shims put in them to have any accuracy at all.
There are many other problems involving the rifle at almost every important point in its acquisition.
The mafia had JFK killed.