Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans claim a major victory with passage of health-care overhaul
Washington Post ^ | May 4, 2017 | Ed O'Keefe, Paige Winfield Cunningham and Amy Goldstein

Posted on 05/04/2017 3:58:07 PM PDT by Innovative

House Republicans on Thursday narrowly passed a controversial bill to overhaul the nation’s health-care system, claiming a major victory even as the measure faces an uncertain fate in the closely divided U.S. Senate.

Under intense pressure to show they can govern and to make good on their promise to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, Republicans pushed through the bill after adopting a last-minute change that earned it just enough votes to pass. However, the House version fell significantly short of the GOP’s long-held goals, making major dents in large portions of the current law but not outright repealing it.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; healthcare; obamacare; republicans; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Good start. I hope the Senate will follow and pass it too.
1 posted on 05/04/2017 3:58:07 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

They won’t. Take it to the bank.


2 posted on 05/04/2017 3:59:09 PM PDT by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Crow while you can, the Senate will either fail to pass it or make it so bad we will wish they hadn’t.


3 posted on 05/04/2017 3:59:59 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Yes. First and ten, on the democrat 40.
4 posted on 05/04/2017 4:01:01 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Primary source video;

“Watch LIVE as President Donald J. Trump delivers a statement from the Rose Garden.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3550256/posts


5 posted on 05/04/2017 4:01:20 PM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Trump met his promise, if it gets bolloxed up in the Senate he can point the finger at those responsible.


6 posted on 05/04/2017 4:01:44 PM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

If the Senate passes anything, it will still be a step forward, then it can still be fixed in conference.


7 posted on 05/04/2017 4:02:07 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

cripes...they’re spiking the ball on the fifty yard line.


8 posted on 05/04/2017 4:04:55 PM PDT by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

The Senate will pass it and sooner than you think. It’s not like the Senate and the House members don’t talk to each other.


9 posted on 05/04/2017 4:05:54 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

John McLame and his girl friend Linda Graham are both critical and John said he does not approve of it. These and others in the house and senate are anti we the people and all pro me me me.


10 posted on 05/04/2017 4:08:11 PM PDT by DOC44 (Have gun will travel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

“they’re spiking the ball on the fifty yard line.”

sometimes in a big game and it is 4th and 45 from your own 2 and you complete a pass to the 50 it makes you want to spike the ball right there on the 50 yard line.


11 posted on 05/04/2017 4:11:52 PM PDT by DOC44 (Have gun will travel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

“cripes...they’re spiking the ball on the fifty yard line.”

I would consider it to be like a coach’s pep talk.


12 posted on 05/04/2017 4:19:35 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

Oh, yes they will. You know why? Because this also happened today:

H.R. 2192 - Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ)
House Vote on Passage
May 4, 2017 2:10 p.m.
Passed 429/0

“Summary
H.R. 2192 strikes the section of the American Health Care Act that exempts Members of Congress and congressional staff from the waivers of federal mandates of essential health benefits, age rating, and community rating.”

https://policy.house.gov/legislative/bills/hr-2192-amend-public-health-service-act-eliminate-non-application-certain-state


13 posted on 05/04/2017 4:49:31 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Please decipher/translate for those of us whose eyes are crossing after a long day of work.

Many thanks!!


14 posted on 05/04/2017 4:53:37 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
H.R. 2192 - Rep. Martha McSally (R-AZ)

This bill makes it so Congress isn't exempt from OBAMACARE... which is being repealed. The question is... will they be exempt from the NEW healthcare plan they're replacing Obamacare with?

15 posted on 05/04/2017 4:56:14 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
It's a scam.

It neither repeals nor replaces ACA, it amends ACA.

Here's one of the amendments:

SEC. 205. INDIVIDUAL MANDATE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—

  (1) in paragraph (2)(B)(iii), by striking ‘‘2.5 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘Zero percent’’, and

  (2) in paragraph (3)—

    (A) by striking ‘‘$695’’ in subparagraph (A) and inserting ‘‘$0’’, and

    (B) by striking subparagraph (D).

http://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=105944


Relevant part of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986:

26 U.S. Code § 5000A - Requirement to maintain minimum essential coverage

(2) Monthly penalty amounts
    For purposes of paragraph (1)(A), the monthly penalty amount with respect to any taxpayer for any 
    month during which any failure described in subsection (b)(1) occurred is an amount equal to 1⁄12 
    of the greater of the following amounts:

  (A) Flat dollar amount
      An amount equal to the lesser of—

    (i) the sum of the applicable dollar amounts for all individuals with respect to whom such failure 
        occurred during such month, or

    (ii) 300 percent of the applicable dollar amount (determined without regard to paragraph (3)(C)) for
         the calendar year with or within which the taxable year ends.

  (B) Percentage of incomeAn amount equal to the following percentage of the excess of the taxpayer’s 
      household income for the taxable year over the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) 
      with respect to the taxpayer for the taxable year:

    (i) 1.0 percent for taxable years beginning in 2014.

    (ii) 2.0 percent for taxable years beginning in 2015.

    (iii) 2.5 percent for taxable years beginning after 2015.

(3) Applicable dollar amountFor purposes of paragraph (1)—

  (A) In general
      Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the applicable dollar amount is $695.

  (B) Phase in
      The applicable dollar amount is $95 for 2014 and $325 for 2015.

  (C) Special rule for individuals under age 18
      If an applicable individual has not attained the age of 18 as of the beginning of a month, the applicable
      dollar amount with respect to such individual for the month shall be equal to one-half of the applicable 
      dollar amount for the calendar year in which the month occurs.

  (D) Indexing of amount
      In the case of any calendar year beginning after 2016, the applicable dollar amount shall be equal to 
      $695, increased by an amount equal to—

    (i) $695, multiplied by

    (ii) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year, determined by 
         substituting “calendar year 2015” for “calendar year 1992” in subparagraph (B) thereof. If the amount 
         of any increase under clause (i) is not a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the next 
         lowest multiple of $50.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5000A

The individual mandate has not been repealed. The penalty amounts have been set to zero, yet the mandate and the structure remain.

Not only have Republicans failed to deliver the promised repeal of ACA, they have lied about it by claiming this amendment of ACA is repeal. They also lie when they say the individual mandate has been repealed.

If one iota of the effort spent on deception was spent on actually doing what they pretend to be doing we'd be a lot better off.

16 posted on 05/04/2017 4:59:49 PM PDT by Ray76 (DRAIN THE SWAMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOC44; stylin19a

Here are the House Moron Dems spiking the 2018 ball the on the 5 yard line. On their 5 yard line.

“Democrats sang Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye on the House floor at House Republicans after the GOP passed the American Health Care Act”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=15&v=OsuGH9NNND0


17 posted on 05/04/2017 5:17:26 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Sure, Jane.

How I understand it is, the AHCA had to include provisions that Congress could exempt themselves from mandate waivers sought by their own states in order to comply with the Byrd rule and retain reconciliation 51-vote rule privilege. As soon as the AHCA passed under the 51-vote rule, HR2192 went back in and slam, bang, eliminated that exemption. No more special treatment - they get what we get.

(paragraphs intentionally broken:)
“Background:
Under the American Health Care Act, states may apply for waivers from the Affordable Care Act’s mandates on essential health benefits, age rating, and community rating. 

The MacArthur Amendment, which included these provisions, exempted Members of Congress and congressional staff in order to comply with the U.S. Senate’s procedural instructions and the Byrd rule.
 
Without such an exemption, the bill’s privileged status under the reconciliation process that only requires a 51-vote threshold in the Senate could have been jeopardized.

H.R. 2192 fixes this problem and ensures that any changes made to the health care law apply to Members of Congress and their staffs.”


18 posted on 05/04/2017 5:40:56 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: blueplum

Thank you for your translation! I really appreciate it.

So....the Dems ALL voted on this?? To stop the special treatment and give them what we get??? Shocked, I tell you....I am shocked!

Also....what are the odds of the Senate NOT sneaking the “Good enough for thee, but not for me” exemption back in?


19 posted on 05/04/2017 5:46:27 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

This is so stupid I almost don’t believe it.

Almost.


20 posted on 05/04/2017 5:49:09 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson