.
Obama’s accomplishments are legendary.
People are still trying to verify them.
All they are finding is shards of smokey tinted mirror glass.
Interesting, cogent read. Reminds me of how much I hate that prick.
In church doctrine, we have the AntiChrist. An Obama as President might be an AntiGeorge, the opposite of George Washington in every way.
Obama was ‘Anti’ a lot of things, many of them Pro-American and Pro-Capitalism.
Bkmk
” Further, as is common knowledge, the biographical dossier we have at our disposal is radically incomplete. All Obama’s vital documents are sequestered: his name change, baptism and adoption records, Noelani Elementary School records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, record with Illinois State Bar Association, and his law client list, medical records and passport records, among others. He has also suppressed the marriage license of his parents. His backdated Selective Service form remains unexplained and his Massachusetts Social Security Number appears to be invalid. Moreover, the digital copy of Obama’s birth certificate released by the White House on April 27, 2011 remains contentious; its authenticity has been disputed by many expert analysts. And there is considerably more that suggests we are dealing with a factitious personage, which would also qualify him for the title of Anti-President.”
So, he can open sealed records oc his political opponents yet, we are unable to turn about fair play...
Have other presidents and candidates released all that?
Some of that stuff may already have been in the public record and some of it may have been leaked by third parties, but few candidates release such material if they can possibly avoid it.
Obama isn’t going away.
Maybe not. He may find it hard to stay away.
But right now -- strange as it may be -- Hillary Clinton is actually more of a presence on the national scene than the ex-president.
Obama may find it harder to stay off the golf course than Hillary Clinton can.
.
I always called him the narrator-in-chief. He always acted like the problems of the country weren’t his problem but someone else’s. He would speak of these problems with detachment and in the abstract.