Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McConnell rejects Trump filibuster idea
CNBC ^ | May 2, 2017

Posted on 05/03/2017 6:54:01 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The top Republican in the Senate on Tuesday rejected President Donald Trump's suggestion that his party change the chamber's rules to undercut the ability of Democrats to block legislation with filibusters.

"There is an overwhelming majority on a bipartisan basis that is not interested in changing the way the Senate operates on the legislative calendar," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: budget; filibuster; gopestablishment; liberalgop; mcconnell; rino; senate; yertle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Rusty0604

” ... the only solution is to vote in a 60 majority in the Senate.”

Even with sixty there would still be a handful of Yertle RINOs who prefer “bi-partisanship”, so their excuse then would be “We need 75 seats.” So perhaps then they demand 100 seats.
As long as they don’t want to do what America voted for last November, they will always have excuses. It’s always something for cuckservatives and their sycophants here.


21 posted on 05/03/2017 7:22:31 AM PDT by tumblindice ("Fight for your country." Hector)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Then the overwhelming majority of Americans who oppose this Bullcrap about their ridiculous privilege rules which have NO Constitutional standing need to remove all these clowns who are GOP incumbents.

Were the roles reversed, we have SEEN what the Democrats would do.

END THE RIDICULOUS CONGRESSIONAL AND SENATE PROCEDURAL RULES.

VOTE OUT AN INCUMBENT IN THE NEXT PRIMARY!!!


22 posted on 05/03/2017 7:22:45 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN!! HE KILLED OBAMACARE REPEAL AND WILL KILL TAX REFORM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

[You are correct. I’ve seen a number of posts stating the only solution is to vote in a 60 majority in the Senate. While I admire their perpetual optimism, now is the time to drain the swamp before it’s too late.]

“We have the House, we need the Senate”

“We have the Senate, we need the Presidency”

“We have the Presidency, but we need a filibuster-proof majority”

Future meme:

“We have the filibuster-proof majority but our corporate donors call the shots”


23 posted on 05/03/2017 7:23:21 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Ignorance is reparable, stupid is forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

McConJob & The RYNO Ryan ARE The Most Worthless Members Of The Republican Party!


24 posted on 05/03/2017 7:25:03 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Term limits! Term limits! Term limits!


25 posted on 05/03/2017 7:28:11 AM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Exactly!

Hey McConnell: 48 of that “majority” are dumblecrats....the rest are pansy rhinos....

[spit]

Get some BALLS, sir...get some balls.


26 posted on 05/03/2017 7:39:58 AM PDT by Adder (Mr. Franklin: We are trying to get the Republic back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrmeyer
We’re not voting our way out of this mess folks.

Nope. It's like a Pez dispenser.

Primary one congresscritter and up pops another, hand-picked from the swamp no different from the first. Any "outsider" who manages to confound that process is swiftly dealt with (either by bringing in "ringers" to drain away votes, or by surreptitiously funneling $$ to the RAT candidate).

And the loser who got primaried? He/she gets a cushy K Street gig...

27 posted on 05/03/2017 7:44:56 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
We in-fight a lot on FR these days but if President Trump ever decides to really fight the: "overwhelming majority on a bipartisan basis that is not interested in changing the way the Senate operates..." I'll support him and his supports 110%, with my dying breath.

I detest the overwhelming majority bisexual Senate.


28 posted on 05/03/2017 7:46:31 AM PDT by Theophilus (Repent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus

Fight for the repeal of the 17th Amendment. It was the beginning of the progressive era and trampled states rights.


29 posted on 05/03/2017 7:52:37 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

mcconnell is such a castrato loser.


30 posted on 05/03/2017 8:17:24 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer; All
Patriots are reminded that, regardless that voters “own” the Senate (or does the Senate “own” the voters?) through the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, and regardless that patriots have now had four election cycles to replace possibly 133% (correction welcome) of the Senate, conservatives still control only a pathetic, constitutionally useless simple Senate majority. :^(

In fact, the Senate doesn’t have the required supermajority to expel state sovereignty-ignoring members like Sen. Schumer.

Clause 2: Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member [emphasis added].

And I suspect that the corrupt Senate doesn’t want to have a supermajority because a divided Senate probably makes it easier for the feds to not only help the House steal state powers, but also to use those stolen powers to oppress the states and their citizens.

Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!

Remember in November ’18 !

Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.

Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.

In fact, if Justice Gorsuch turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.

Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.

While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.

Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.

Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.


31 posted on 05/03/2017 10:54:18 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Not interested in changing the way the Senate operates.

No sh*t the good old boy club took years to form they aren’t going to let anything stop them.Only the voter can drain the D.C. swamp but he non voter keeps the good old boy club in business.


32 posted on 05/03/2017 10:55:25 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I remember that last year Ryan said that we should accept the extension of the budget until next year because he wanted to clear the decks. We could start the new year with time to prepare the budget correctly.

Now he says that there is nothing they can do because this years budget is a continuation of last years budget. But next year we are going to prepare the budget correctly.

33 posted on 05/03/2017 11:34:59 AM PDT by oldbrowser (What next shall we require life insurance companies to insure people that are already dead?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise
That's what I say to him too. We know exactly how the Demons would be running over us as they've been there and done that.

Go to hell turtle and I'm giving you my finger in your face.

Are we done playing nice with the RINO's yet? I know I am.

Hit the phones and emails with me. I'll even go the O 'Riley way on them if I have to.
34 posted on 05/03/2017 12:12:51 PM PDT by ssfromla (Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; AuH2ORepublican

Aw c’mon, let’s attack him! Better yet, even though it’s the Senate, lets find a way to blame it on Ryan!


35 posted on 05/03/2017 3:46:39 PM PDT by Impy (End the kritarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Impy
RE:”Aw c’mon, let’s attack him! Better yet, even though it’s the Senate, lets find a way to blame it on Ryan!”

The master negotiator got 'rolled' while playing 3D Chess.
But he knows exactly what he is doing.

He has Ryan + Co exactly where he wants them.

36 posted on 05/03/2017 5:54:10 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Trump "Mexico will pay for the Wall! Mark my words")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

I have no doubt that you are correct. Remember the date: 19 April, 1775.


37 posted on 05/04/2017 4:42:14 AM PDT by Howie66 ("Tone down the tagline please." - Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
Schumer probably kissed McConnell on the lips after McConnell refused to consider changing Senate rules on the legislative filibuster. Fortunately, no one got a picture of that…..

Ryan had his hand over the camera lens.

38 posted on 05/04/2017 4:49:46 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
I remember that last year Ryan said that we should accept the extension of the budget until next year because he wanted to clear the decks. We could start the new year with time to prepare the budget correctly.

Now he says that there is nothing they can do because this years budget is a continuation of last years budget. But next year we are going to prepare the budget correctly.


39 posted on 05/04/2017 4:53:54 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("Game over, man, game over!" (my advice to DemocRATs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson