Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rxsid

I agree. It’s a sub delivered EMP attack.


7 posted on 05/01/2017 12:21:23 PM PDT by batterycommander (I learned my Artillery skills from the United States Marines. USNA 65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: batterycommander
"I agree. It’s a sub delivered EMP attack."

Another possibility, although easier to detect (& thus prevent), a launch from a converted freighter.

16 posted on 05/01/2017 12:38:41 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: batterycommander

But don’t you still need a Re-Entry Vehicle for the Warhead? At what altitude can you detonate a warhead and create the EMP to fry the electric grid? Consider the intercontinental distance, can you still have an effective EMP at 100 miles in space? Seems pretty far away to me.

Testing a detonation in the atmosphere is different than in space at oG too.

The Friday missile blew up at 25 miles from launch, this than a minute. Does not sound like a worthwhile relevant test to me.


28 posted on 05/01/2017 12:59:14 PM PDT by Jimmy The Snake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: batterycommander
It’s a sub delivered EMP attack.

Wouldn't even need to be a sub, if it's a scud type missile. You could put one of those on a freighter or a fishing boat, and it could cruise close to the Pacific Coast and lob the missile. We wouldn't have much, if any, warning.

34 posted on 05/01/2017 4:07:23 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson