Ban Muslims from the beach and problem solved. They are the problem, not women.
This will be interesting watching the feminazis defending this man’s behavior since he’s in the most protected class (Muslim).
Fly him back to Afghanistan. Fee one way travel. Coach.
Tell him don’t come back to Australia. Ever.
the wheels are coming off the wagon. in baltimore, the state’s attorney has suggested that illegal immigrants not be charged when they are arrested, so as to relieve the local officials from having to notify ICE.
so, in other words, there are no laws if you are an illegal.
If you're a 'globalist', then is this the behavior you want to be standard in the new global community? No? Then, the behavior must be punished.
If on the other hand, you're not a 'globalist', then the 'immigrant' must be expected to live within the laws of the land he immigrated to, right? Therefore, he must be punished.
The only way this makes sense is if the judge is a self-hating liberal, riddled with guilt over his 'privilege', seeking to 'even the score'. Sick!
A little confused now, so according to da judge it’s OK now to grab women by the p?
For every one of ours who is assaulted under the justification of her scanty attire, just shoot one of theirs dressed in that bee-keeper looking sack called a nicab or who-jab or jig-jab or whatever. A side benefit would be to reduce their breeders.
What if a Muslim assaults a transgender woman? Would there be any outrage?
Only if yer muslim.
OTOH, if you are a foreign muslim and you rape a girl in a civilized country, you should be emasculated and returned to your country of origin to spread the word that raping a western woman is a VERY BAD IDEA.
Same for ones born in country, except returned to your neighborhood.
As Lord Raglan said, then we should practice our culture and hang the s-o-bs.
I believe in England they do use Sharia law in some cases. They respect it as a thing. WRONG.
I learned that there is an Arab Muslim custom for mothers to sexually stimulate their little boys to calm them. This sets up a dangerous cycle in the boy’s mind, that women are responsible for his arousal. Then men have decreed in Muslim lands that women are divided into private or public. A private woman must not be touched. She is a close relative or a stranger complete covered in the rpesence of her male relatives, and if in public with only other will be in a group, walking quickly and purposefully to their next destination. Any other non close relative is a public woman and she is basically a whore existing for him to touch and have his way with.
Western countries need to announce this to their entire populations, and explain there is a zero tolerance policy on it. Mandatory or deportation. We need to be HONEST on media about this part of Islam. IT IS NOT A PART OF OUR CULTURE. Right now, in Germany, Sweden, etc, they keep quiet about these crimes and hide hem as best they can, and pretend these men are “just like us.” It isn’t true. Our two cultures don’t fit. There is no good reason to combine them.
It’s sad and more than a little pathetic that we even need to have this conversation.
Smart women would be careful where they expose that much. Around home - ok. Out in public? No Normal women brought up by a mother and father who love and care about them would not wear that in public - regardless of what others are doing. JMO
The government exists to protect its own citizens.
No, but some deserve to be ogled in deep appreciation for the female body.
Sounds like the author has culture problems of his own.
I’m beginning to think that Islam is exposing liberal men’s secret hatred for and frustration with women.
“When the government no longer supports the public instead of criminals, or worse, when they take the side of criminals against the public, vigilantism results.”
Vigilantes are almost always peaceful, following all the rules to petition the government to change its ways. And when these petitions, and voting, are ignored and disdained by government, the vigilantes create legal means of self protection and defense against the criminals.
Typically, at this point, the bad government imagines the vigilantes to be a bigger threat to their power than are the criminals, so seeks to outlaw the vigilantes, or even to use violence against them, by the police, even in cooperation with the criminals.
This is about the final straw for the vigilantes, who still try to carry out the expulsion of criminals through less violent means. But if this is interfered with, the vigilantes finally resort to violence against the criminals, and maybe the police and the bad government.
By the time a superior government authority arrives to restore order, both the criminals and corrupt government are long gone, and peace and normality are already restored, along with an ongoing cleanup of any damages.
The superior government is assured that the situation is under control, the election of a new government will happen soon, and there is no possibility of a restoration of the previous government.
It is a shame how the British legal system has developed to help criminals. Australia’s legal system is an extreme example of how a persons freedoms and rights have been destroyed.