Skip to comments.
CA Sheriff Hits Back at "Sanctuary State" Rhetoric by Showing Just Who Would be Protected
Townhall.com ^
| April 29, 2017
| Jennifer Van Laar
Posted on 04/30/2017 10:55:13 AM PDT by jazusamo
Source: http://www.facebook.com/VenturaCountySheriff
Much attention has been given to the antics of crazy California politicians like Kamala Harris, Kevin de Leon, and Nancy Pelosi, who all advocate for sanctuary city/state policies and call anyone opposed to their view racist or " white supremacist " - and can somehow say with a straight face that this policy doesn't put Americans at risk.
But, there are elected officials and law enforcement officers in the state who strongly oppose these policies and, in particular, Senate Bill 54 , which would prohibit law enforcement agencies in the state from using "agency or department moneys, facilities, property, equipment, or personnel to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes."
Law enforcement associations have made their concerns known, but since SB 54 has passed the Senate, the Ventura County Sheriff's Department is taking their concerns straight to the public, posting a "rap sheet " of some of the actual Ventura County inmates recently detained by ICE.
As a follow-up to our concerns over Senate Bill 54, we would like to provide more factual information regarding the types of individuals that would be released into our community if immigration authorities are not allowed in our jail as would be mandated by this bill. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has continued to review inmates in the jail who might have possibly been in the country illegally.
The report stated that ICE had detained 50 inmates in the last 30 days, but the county averages 1,373 ICE detainers a year. All but one of the 50 had either a prior arrest history, current felony charges, or prior deportation orders (yet found themselves in jail again). The Sheriff's Department then posted a sample of the charges of those detained by ICE:
- Inmate 1 Current Arrest felony domestic violence; Prior Arrests drunk driving; stealing a vehicle; hit and run; drunk in public; under the influence of a controlled substance; possession of drugs; possession of drug paraphernalia
- Inmate 2 Current Arrest felony domestic violence; dissuading a victim from testifying; obstructing the use of a communication devices to prevent summoning assistance; Prior Arrests felony domestic violence (twice); assault with a deadly weapon; child endangerment; illegal entry; previously deported
- Inmate 3 Current Arrest felony domestic violence; false imprisonment; resisting arrest; kidnapping; Prior Arrests sexual battery; burglary; robbery; false information to a peace officer; brandishing a weapon; false imprisonment; kidnapping; stealing a vehicle; illegal entry; previously deported
- Inmate 4 Current Arrest possession of a controlled substance for sale; transportation of a controlled substance (twice); driving on a suspended license; Prior Arrests battery (twice); drunk in public; vandalism; transportation, sales, or distribution of a dangerous drug; transportation of a controlled substance; drunk driving (twice)
- Inmate 5 Current Arrest felony drunk driving; driving without an ignition interlock device; driving on a suspended license; Prior Arrests lewd acts with a child under 14; driving on a suspended drivers license (five times); drunk driving (twice); unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor
- Inmate 6 Current Arrest assault with a deadly weapon; attempted kidnapping; Prior Arrests possession of drugs (twice); possession of drug paraphernalia (three times); prowling; theft (twice); false information to a peace officer (twice); drunk in public; robbery (three times); felony domestic violence; assault with a deadly weapon (three times); kidnapping (twice)
- Inmate 7 Current Arrest domestic violence; Prior Arrests felony criminal threats (twice); domestic violence (twice); child endangerment; driving without a license; driving with a suspended license; possession of drugs; theft (twice); possession of stolen property; false information to a peace officer; stealing a vehicle; illegal entry
- Inmate 8 Current Arrest kidnapping; false imprisonment; lewd acts with a child under 14; Prior Arrests resisting arrest; under the influence of drugs (twice); kidnapping; lewd acts with a child under 14, drunk in public
- Inmate 9 Current Arrest warrant for resisting arrest, false information to a peace officer, domestic violence, violation of a domestic violence court order; Prior Arrests brandishing a weapon; felony domestic violence; felony criminal threats; drunk in public (twice); violation of a domestic violence court order (three times); vandalism; domestic violence (twice); resisting arrest (twice); false information to a peace officer
- Inmate 10 Current Arrest felony domestic violence; Prior Arrests felony domestic violence; previously deported
- Inmate 11 Current Arrest possession of a short barreled shotgun; Prior Arrests assault with a deadly weapon, possession of a short barreled shotgun (twice), assault, carrying a concealed firearm, illegal entry
- Inmate 12 Current Arrest under the influence of drugs; Prior Arrests felony domestic violence, burglary, inflicting injury to a child, under the influence of drugs, resisting arrest, unlicensed driver, drunk driving, possession of drug paraphernalia, false information to a peace officer
- Inmate 13 Current Arrest possession of drugs for sale; Prior Arrests possession of drugs for sale (twice); previously deported
- Inmate 14 Current Arrest under the influence of drugs; Prior Arrest member of a street gang, assault with a deadly weapon, conspiracy, possession of drugs, drunk driving, trespassing
- Inmate 15 Current Arrest felony domestic violence; Prior Arrests felony domestic violence; child endangerment; false imprisonment; domestic battery; drunk driving; hit and run
Members of gangs, drug dealers, sex offenders, pedophiles, assault with a deadly weapon, repeat drunk drivers, repeat domestic violence, violating court orders - yeah, these are not harmless people just looking for a way to have a better life. Good for you, Sheriff, on giving the people you're sworn to protect the facts.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aliens; california; criminalaliens; criminals; ice; illegalaliens; sanctuarycities; sanctuarystate; venturacounty; venturasheriff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Good for the Ventura County Sheriff's Department!
1
posted on
04/30/2017 10:55:13 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
I live in the county and think this is great. But with the heavy concentration of illegals in this county and the liberal attitudes of most voters, I suspect the Sheriff will be gone after the next election.
To: jazusamo
Future neighbors for the sanctuary-loving libs.
3
posted on
04/30/2017 11:07:05 AM PDT
by
MarMema
To: jazusamo
This is THE issue ripe for scotus.
State law rights against federal law . Locals want to comply.
Who trumps and what power of purse can be applied.
4
posted on
04/30/2017 11:09:48 AM PDT
by
RummyChick
(can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
To: Bernard Marx
Totally agree with you. Am familiar with Ventura and LA County, they’re both headed in the wrong direction and have been for years.
5
posted on
04/30/2017 11:12:32 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
Throw in some possession and sales of stolen property and those arrest records look a lot like the local Bandido chapter when I lived in Washington State. The big difference being, we can kick the illegals out.
6
posted on
04/30/2017 11:14:24 AM PDT
by
USNBandit
(Sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: USNBandit
“The big difference being, we can kick the illegals out.”
Not so fast. We now have a so-called governor and an attorney general (nuisance) who love the illegals. WA State is sinking fast!
7
posted on
04/30/2017 11:30:38 AM PDT
by
beelzepug
(Anybody I attack may rest assured it's personal!)
To: Bernard Marx
“I suspect the Sheriff will be gone after the next election.”.....
Unfortunately, I will have to agree with that statement. “Kalifornica” is lost and unless the rest of this country wakes up to what this law enforcement officer has shown, there will be many, many more places “lost” as well. God Bless that Sheriff.
8
posted on
04/30/2017 11:31:30 AM PDT
by
DaveA37
MAGA!
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
9
posted on
04/30/2017 11:35:09 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
OK, so maybe I’m missing something here but all fifteen cases the sheriff mentioned are felony arrests. Isn’t the sheriff holding them and processing them based on those? Why would their immigration status make any difference?
To: DaveA37
“...there will be many, many more places lost as well. God Bless that Sheriff.”
Not many, the whole country! The balance of power everywhere is under siege by the Left, and unfortunately, despite the last general election, they continue to make progress.
To: jazusamo
I hope our Orange County Sheriff ignores this sanctuary nonsense for illegals.
To: DoodleDawg
Because after their adjudication in CA courts they would be set free if CA politicians get their way, they should have already been removed, some of them were and came back.
That’s why we need a wall.
13
posted on
04/30/2017 12:05:51 PM PDT
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: DoodleDawg
These 15 illegals are being held by ICE, they’re examples.
Here’s a very short excerpt from CA SB 54:
“Existing law provides that when there is reason to believe that a person arrested for a violation of specified controlled substance provisions may not be a citizen of the United States, the arresting agency shall notify the appropriate agency of the United States having charge of deportation matters.
This bill would repeal those provisions.”
There’s much more.
14
posted on
04/30/2017 12:10:19 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
California wants to refuse to follow federal law. Says it doesn’t have to.
California wants to make a law that all counties must be “sanctuary” cities.
Does California say localities may not refuse to follow state law? Says counties must follow state law?
As opposed to states being able to refuse federal law
15
posted on
04/30/2017 12:19:34 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: jazusamo
They also need to show who this policy of following the law helps.
It helps the Hispanic community.
The victims of these crimes committed by these illegal aliens are overwhelmingly against Hispanics.
16
posted on
04/30/2017 12:21:40 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: ifinnegan
You make an excellent point and it’s absolutely true.
There are large areas of So CA counties that are mostly Hispanic and many live in fear of gangs and illegals.
17
posted on
04/30/2017 12:28:06 PM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
“There are large areas of So CA counties that are mostly Hispanic and many live in fear of gangs and illegals.”
Yes.
18
posted on
04/30/2017 12:31:55 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: jazusamo
Too bad these GD politicians responsible for decades long open violent borders, resulting in hundreds of thousands of American victims at the hands of their precious criminal illegal alien associates, have never been held responsible.
Never forget.
19
posted on
04/30/2017 1:00:03 PM PDT
by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: jazusamo
This bill would repeal those provisions. But it would require that the authorities notify ICE of the scheduled release or parole of any illegal who has been doing time for a violent or serious felony, or had done time for a violent or serious felony in the past. Every one of the cases cited by the sheriff would fall under those guidelines.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson