This article proves once again why the Slimes doesn't dare print the truth.
This article proves once again why the Slimes doesn't dare print the truth.
Well, I suppose in NYC this is still the dogma of record..............What a cesspool.
Sick intolerant liberals
You mean...(gulp)...the truth?
People are furiously cancelling their New York Times subscriptions because it sucks.
There, fixed it.
CC
Say what????
Honest debate - such an old fashioned notion!
The big liberal cities and liberal states are well on their way to being gigantic safe-spaces for close minded libtards who cannot bear to hear a dissenting thought or a new idea.
Vicious truthing is what I call it.
APOSTATE!!!!
He must be burned at the stake for committing Sacrilege!
The ferocity of the backlash is further proof that anthropomorphic global warming has become a religion.
Any pretense of AGW being science is long gone for any dispassionate observer.
Scientific truth has become whatever fits the opinion of what the majority want to believe. This is the definition of a religion where truth is accepted on faith without the validity that comes from proof.
Can anyone tell me what are the sacraments of the Environweenie Religion?
I wish that instead of fighting the liberals on this conservatives would just say “you’re right, that’s why we need more nuclear power plants.”
This is hilarious - liberals destroying their own. I guess the only acceptable news sources will be Mother Jones, HuffPo and Daily Kos.
It really does crystalize the mainstream liberal view that the only protected acceptable speech is one that toes the party line. Personally I’ve always felt that the best way to win your battle in the court of public opinion is to prove your case with facts and logic, rather than outlaw your opponents views.
The ferocity of the global warming cultists indicates just how many people, companies and indeed countries have sunk megabucks into it being real. If they can’t make the rubes buy it, they’re screwed.
Oops, they’re reporting more sides to a story than we want to hear. There’s only one side—our side. The only truth we need to know is what we make ourselves.
this is nothing new, subscriptions have been plummeting for years now.
the only people who subscribe to the ‘failing’ NYT are people older than 70 and politicians or similar gov’t parasites
Frankly if anything sticks a knife into the circulation numbers of the New York Times I’m perfectly okay with it. May it die in peace
Did the author of this piece even read the NYT article?
Here's the article:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/28/opinion/climate-of-complete-certainty.html?_r=0
Here's a quote from the article:
Anyone who has read the 2014 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change knows that, while the modest (0.85 degrees Celsius, or about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit) warming of the Northern Hemisphere since 1880 is indisputable, as is the human influence on that warming, much else that passes as accepted fact is really a matter of probabilities. That’s especially true of the sophisticated but fallible models and simulations by which scientists attempt to peer into the climate future. To say this isn’t to deny science. It’s to acknowledge it honestly.In other words, Stephens specifically accepts that SOME anthropogenic global warming has occurred. He's not an AGW denier, he's a "lukewarmer"
Stephens also says this:
None of this is to deny climate change or the possible severity of its consequences.
So, in the article, Stephens specifically denies that he is a denier.
Unless Business Insider subscribers enjoy reading fake news, it's time for them to start furiously cancelling their subscriptions.
Wait a minute. You mean the NYT told them the truth about climate change and they’re furious?
You see, liberals can’t bear to be wrong. Climate change is an idea and not a principle. They are not betraying their principles if they open their minds to just the possibility climate change is wrong.