Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Berkeley Silences Free Speech With a Kick in the Teeth
Townhall.com ^ | April 27, 2017 | Todd Starnes

Posted on 04/27/2017 11:14:39 AM PDT by Kaslin

There is a clear and present danger to conservative students at the University of California Berkeley.

The birthplace of the so-called free speech movement is now the epicenter of a nefarious movement to silence freedom-loving young people.

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter had been scheduled to speak today, but she canceled.

Leftwing groups had threatened to silence Ms. Coulter by any means necessary.

But the university refused to guarantee the safety of Ms. Coulter or the students who invited her to speak – the Young America’s Foundation.

I know these students. I know this organization. They are good people – patriots all. They are students who battle with words and ideas – not baseball bats and switchblades.

And contrary to accusations made by some conservatives on Twitter, Young America’s Foundation did not “acquiesce” to the liberal bullies at Berkeley.

It’s important for you to understand the context of what YAF was hoping to accomplish with Ms. Coulter’s planned address.

It was not meant to be some sort of free-for-all in the campus plaza. The event was meant to be a civilized lecture inside some sort of auditorium or lecture hall.

YAF is not in the business of hosting conservative gatherings that resemble professional wrestling shows. They are meant to foster thoughtful and enlightened debate and conversation.

So why – you may ask – did the conservatives not proceed with Ms. Coulter’s speech?

It turns out the university’s police department has a stand down policy – meaning they do not get involved unless there is an imminent loss of life, according to a lawsuit filed by YAF.

In other words – liberals get a free pass to beat the living daylights out of conservative kids so long as the victims still have a pulse.

All the while Berkeley administrators look the other way – while speech liberals disagree with is silenced.

“Berkeley should be ashamed for creating this hostile atmosphere,” YAF president Ron Robinson told the Washington Examiner. “Berkeley made it impossible to hold a lecture due to the lack of assurances for protections from foreseeable violence from unrestrained leftist agitators.”

It would’ve been like throwing red meat to a pack of liberal jackals.

“I had the misfortune of being in a leftist riot as a student, and I wouldn’t want to put my children or anyone else’s children into that situation without assurances that law enforcement would protect them,” Robinson said.

I suppose we should not be all that surprised over the campus uprisings happening across the country. These are the children of the Obama generation – a generation that was taught to silence any speech they disagree with.

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” President Obama once said.

That is the legacy of the Obama Administration – if you can’t silence conservatives, just beat the living daylights out of them.

It is the irony of ironies.

The so-called free speech movement started at Berkeley and ended at Berkeley – not so much with a whimper – but with a punch to the face.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; anncoulter; berserkely; coulterberkeley; freespeech; toddstarnes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 04/27/2017 11:14:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Leftwing groups had threatened to silence Ms. Coulter by any means necessary.
That would have more punch, IMO, if it was to the point. Leftwing groups had threatened to silence Ms. Coulter by use of physical violence.

I would add that they succeeded.

2 posted on 04/27/2017 11:17:59 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Pull Federal funds from Berkeley (city and campus).

Put Berkeley (city and campus) under martial law.

Deport all illegals from Berkeley, and put all the AntiFa’s and muslim Brotherhood types in internment camps!!!!

The liberal judgy-wudgies of course will attempt to block all this, but it now can be taken to the Supreme Court!!!!


3 posted on 04/27/2017 11:19:35 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

BTTT


4 posted on 04/27/2017 11:21:28 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

The sooner the better.


5 posted on 04/27/2017 11:22:17 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: All

Just as Americans finally had enough of “professional politicians” in the White House, at some point, they will also have enough of this leftist liberal BS...

Even a rabbit will turn and fight when it reaches a point of no return....


7 posted on 04/27/2017 11:28:03 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Indeed, violence works. Those willing to use violence will always win against those not willing to use violence.


8 posted on 04/27/2017 11:29:15 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

AntiFa = Anti First Amendment, unless you agree with us


9 posted on 04/27/2017 11:32:51 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
I agree.
It's time to get MORE VIOLENT (concealed carry, and blow 'em away) than the left.

10 posted on 04/27/2017 11:34:07 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
-- Those willing to use violence will always win against those not willing to use violence. --

All other things being approximately equal, yep.

Ghandi got an effective non-violent movement going, but his forces were the "Galts" of India, and more numerous by far then the state, which always resorts to violence when it can't obtain submission.

11 posted on 04/27/2017 11:34:41 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The new Fasci di Combattimento.


12 posted on 04/27/2017 11:40:28 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Ping.


13 posted on 04/27/2017 11:42:15 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Spot on!


14 posted on 04/27/2017 11:42:32 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dragone
Where is Jeff Sessions?

Probably somewhere rolling his eyes over your stupid and ridiculous comment.

15 posted on 04/27/2017 11:44:15 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Students gathering in the Berkley Quad before classes ...


16 posted on 04/27/2017 11:50:05 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Ex Scientia Tridens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dragone
dragone

Since April 17, 2017

Where is Jeff Sessions?

Probably somewhere rolling his eyes over your stupid and ridiculous comment, Noobie!!!

17 posted on 04/27/2017 11:53:39 AM PDT by Kaslin ( The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triump. Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Good article. Blue CA is enemy occupied territory.

California’s objections to their feral, masked brownshirts from their leaders, Brown, Feinstein, Boxer, Pelosi, et al?
Crickets...
Their true colors are revealed: the establishment Democrat party is anti-Bill of Rights.
It is now a categorical statement: the liberal left is opposed to liberty.

Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press
Amendment 2 - The Right to Bear Arms
Amendment 3 - The Housing of Soldiers
Amendment 4 - Protection from Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
Amendment 5 - Protection of Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property
Amendment 6 - Rights of Accused Persons in Criminal Cases
Amendment 7 - Rights in Civil Cases
Amendment 8 - Excessive Bail, Fines, and Punishments Forbidden
Amendment 9 - Other Rights Kept by the People
Amendment 10 - Undelegated Powers Kept by the States and the People


18 posted on 04/27/2017 11:56:00 AM PDT by tumblindice (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

good catch.....


19 posted on 04/27/2017 12:04:17 PM PDT by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, really, where is Jeff Sessions on this?


20 posted on 04/27/2017 12:07:31 PM PDT by montaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson