Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

No. That wasn’t what it was made out to be. It didn’t do anything for Congress because they and all their staffers use the DC Exchange- which wouldn’t make any changes.

Anyway, though it was done to meet the Byrd Rule, there are other ways to do that.
PR-wise, it certainly was about the worst language that could have been put in the bill!

Don’t understand what you’re saying about vets.. is it this?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3537010/posts?q=1&;page=1
That has nothing to do with the Macarthur amendment.

I am curious if the language was corrected. “News” tell what’s exciting and then never follows up.


39 posted on 04/26/2017 10:57:18 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

...you are right. Called managers amendment...not macarthur..and yes that is The one


53 posted on 04/26/2017 12:13:33 PM PDT by RummyChick (can we switch Don,Jr for Prince Kush and his flak jacket. From Yacht Party to Warzone ready to wear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson