Posted on 04/24/2017 3:36:44 PM PDT by grundle
Full title: Berkeley Police Refuse To Stop the Riots - When Told People are Being Beaten, Officer Says "...and?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6z4JmU0hY4
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
He’s a Statist collecting his pay and accruing his outsized pension. If he ordered to open fire on “right wing” protesters...he will.
Isn’t this an FBI issue? Don’t they deal with corruption in local law enforcement? Or is that just when it’s 60s era civil righters getting beaten?
Part of me wonders if the cops will stay out of it if our side is winning when the beating starts. I think I know the answer, part of me still wonders.
Blue Lives only matter when the cash and pensions are secure?
Even if it is, would *you* trust today's FBI?
Full title: Berkeley Police Refuse To Stop the Riots - When Told People are Being Beaten, Officer Says "...and?" Lawless
adjective
1. contrary to or without regard for the law:
lawless violence.
2. being without law; uncontrolled by a law; unbridled;
unruly; unrestrained:
lawless passion.
3. illegal:
Lawlessness is a lack of law, in any of the various senses of that word. Lawlessness may describe various conditions.
In society
Anarchy (meaning "without leadership"), is a condition in which a person or group of people reject societal hierarchies, laws, and other institutions. It often entails the dissolution of government.
Beating the people Americans won’t beat
When the “cop” asked, “Next question?”
The guy should’ve asked if public fighting was against the law???
If the “cop” said yes, he should ask the “cop” why he is allowing the law to be broken???
Maybe one day when this officer is being beaten up by thugs, he will scream for help.
Perhaps passerby will respond “...and...?” and refer him to someone else.
As Lou stated, this is a statist who collects a check. They were paid to do nothing and nothing is what they intended to do.
Everything seems to be a corporation anymore where the paycheck will always rule. Especially in bad economic times.
This will not end well. /Captain Incredibly Obvious
The way the police handled this is grounds for a huge lawsuit against the police and city...
Yes, you know the answer already. That’s why Obama and Holder had to marginalize the police force, first. To allow thugs and “teens” to run wild and create as much havoc as possible, without immediate consequences. Which is why one has to be even more selective where you go these days.
A mayor and a "police force" that are aligned with and sworn to defend AGAINST The United States Constitution is an act of treason.
The Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that the police have no duty to respond to any particular case.
JPFO documented this aspect of law in “Dial 911 and die”
I know in the Army ALL press inquiries have to go through our public affairs office, and if you violate this policy you are in deep kimchi— this is to ensure that the “official” answer gets spread, and not one person’s opinion that they will intentionally malign. Yes, they will ask 100 soldiers until one says something inflammatory, then report that as official policy. This is also to ensure information can get a security review to ensure that only elements authorized for public release are included. If the police have a similar policy (and unfortunately, with the Marxist press I can see why that might be necessary), then this might not be as unreasonable as it seems. The officers seemed pissed to me and not happy with the situation, and may be happy this situation is getting press. Just my 2 cents.
I knew aholes like this when I was in the Navy stationed in San Diego back in ‘73
He probably thought it was Trump supporters getting beaten.
I want the National Guard that attended to Kent State, to handle this job.
Do something NOW before a few patriots are MURDERED by Antifa!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.